The front cover of Haunted contains the words "a novel" beneath the title. Let me just say: I don't think it's fair to call this book a novel. It's a book of short stories. The short stories are the most worthwhile parts of it. Really, it is a novel, but it's a very strangely formatted one. There are 24 chapters. Each chapter has three parts to it. The first part is the "novel" itself--a story about 15 or 16 people coming together in this dark, scary house for a so-called "writer's retreat" where they will spend 3 months in isolation creating their masterpiece that they never have the time for in their busy, workaday lives. The second part is a poem, about the person who is about to tell a story. And the third part is the short story itself, told by a character. These are always the highlights of the chapter.
The "novel" element occassionally shows flashes of brilliance. It is interesting to note that Palahniuk claims this book is a reaction to the "reality television" culture so prevalent over the last decade or so. The book was published in 2005. Wikipedia also highlights a couple interesting tidbits--the novel is actually about the "battle for credibility" that has resulted in things like this very blog (easy, immediate, online publishing)--that, and he listened to "Bela Lugosi's Dead" as inspiration while writing--which I find hilarious and awesome. However, more to the point, Haunted is the third novel reviewed on Flying Houses which I will compare to my first novel, further making the point that my first novel probably does deserve to be published on some level. Like A Long Way Down and Crossing California, Haunted relies on a large cast of characters that are really not all that different from one another (in their motivations, at least) trying to do, something. Not anything big and plot-oriented, just, existing, within this strange space. Further, the novel also reads like my rejected idea for a reality television show, Most Popular Writer, which I pitched to an executive at the Bravo Network who informed me that "writing is an inherently solitary act and not interesting for television viewers." I beg to differ, as Haunted, like Choke, Fight Club, Survivor, and Rant (and I may even be missing a couple) has just now recently been announced as an upcoming film with a director attached (announced a day after my review of Snuff). I do believe Haunted would make for a better HBO Miniseries (which could potentially be awesome) but we will have to see how they manage to translate this very long book into a film. At over 400 pages, it's the longest Palahniuk book.
And it's really more a collection of short stories than it is a novel. And to be fair, and not to be rude, I have to say that the previous short story collection reviewed here, Dead Boys by Richard Lange, is a far more compelling read. I have to honestly state that Haunted was my least favorite Palahniuk book yet, on the whole. Snuff may have been a trifle, but it was a trifle that I sped through in two or three days. It's taken me about a week to read Haunted, and with those two William Burroughs books at the same time, which also, were more compelling reads.
That said, there is one very famous short story here that everyone should read, that should go down as a classic along the lines of "The Killers" or "A Good Man is Hard to Find" or "Cathedral" or "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love": "Guts." Anybody who knows anything about Palahniuk would have seen that coming from a mile away. And also this statement: that it is the story Palahniuk famously reads at his appearances that famously has caused over seventy people to lose consciousness. On a personal note, I found this story absolutely fantastic, but I found the "candle wax" part the most stomach-churning, only to find out a few days later that I might require an operation known as a cystoscopy. Thankfully, I didn't, and I hope I never have to undergo that, but knowing my luck, that is just the sort of way God will plan to torture me further. MOVING ON...."Guts" is the first story in the collection and you might just want to read it out of the library one day. If you're interested by the story of the whole novel Haunted it might be worth your time. Honestly, I found it a bit exasperating at times and I am glad I am done reading it.
But there are a few more excellent stories to be found. Off the top of my head, "Swan Song," "Dog Years," "Exodus," "The Nightmare Box," "Crippled," "Hot Potting," "Evil Spirits," and "Obsolete" all work on differing levels. Aside from "Guts," "The Nightmare Box" and its antecedent stories "Poster Child" and "Cassandra" are the strongest thing in Haunted, and actually reveal the major plot-hinging element to the work as a whole. But if you only read those four, you will miss what happens to the Matchmaker, you will miss the absurdity and ridiculousness of "Dog Years" and "Exodus" and you will miss the "Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow"-esque "Obsolete"--which is the final story in the collection and arguably the third-best.
This is a work that can inspire a lot of discussion and might be a good creative writing class course syllabus item. Parts of it are great--as good, or better, than anything else Palahniuk has done. But on the whole, it drags, and is content to be macabre and gross simply for its own sake at times. I will stand by my statement, that I liked Snuff better only because it was a quicker read. Haunted certainly has its moments, and it is a fine moment of experimentation, for Palahniuk has here created a new genre of short story collection/novel hybrid--the phrase "story in novels" which I previously did not understand applies here almost singularly. But those unaccustomed to Pahlaniuk will be better to start off with Fight Club or Survivor or Rant or Choke. Those novels build on tension created from page one and come to satisfying conclusions. This novel starts off with an absolute bang and spends the rest of the time trying to match its previous elan. Still, only this novel could contain a paragraph as hilarious as this:
"Even the Link knows that eating a dead man's severed penis will get him extra prime-time exposure on every late-night talk show in the world. Just to describe how it tasted. After that will be the product endorsements for barbeque sauce and ketchup. After that, his own novelty cookbook. Radio shock-jock shows. After that, more daytime game shows for the rest of his life." (359)
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Monday, October 27, 2008
Cursed from Birth: The Short, Unhappy Life of William S. Burroughs Jr. - William S. Burroughs, Jr., Ed. David Ohle
A book I had always been vaguely interested in pursuing was this autobiography/biography of William S. Burroughs Jr. The first time I encountered the book, in a South Carolina library several years ago, I hadn't known that Burroughs had a son. Even more, he had a son that published two books. And just thinking about the oftentimes off-putting subject matter of Burroughs work, it seemed at odds with his persona that he would be a regular, everday family man. Well, it is not at odds with his persona it turns out, because Burroughs had a somewhat distant relationship with his son.
They had lived together through the son's toddler years, and after the accidental shooting death of his wife, Burroughs sent his son to live with his parents in Palm Beach, Florida. After twelve or so years there, Burroughs the younger wanted to spend time with his father, so he flew to Tangier when he was 16 and witnessed the kind of life his father was leading there. One of the first things that happens is one of his father's friends makes sexual advances towards him. He gets used to it though, for a while at least, and smokes kif, and learns about his father's art. His description of the cut-up method is the one of the best I have read:
"I might mention that Mr. Gysin invented the cut-up method as applied to words or at least he was one of the first to take it seriously. The cut-up method enables the writer to achieve the same effect as the artist can with picture montage. The effect can be and often is shattering to the receptive reader because words are images in a much more personalized and internal sense than pictures. I recollect one mind-blowing ditty that my father had on his tape recorder. It was a word montage by Brion Gysin and consisted of one phrase: 'I come to free the words,' repeated over and over in different order. That is, 'The words are free to come, I come freely to the words, The free come to the words...' And while the words were repeated, the speed of the tape was increased gradually until it became a supersonic whine. But because of the rhythm, and after the cartoon laughter stage, some part of the listener would keep pace until he was virtually transported. To where, I don't know, or cannot report." (15)
I shouldn't attempt to lay down Junior's whole life story here. The book consists of four lengthy chapters which gradually will break one's heart. The first half of each chapter is Burroughs Jr.'s own writing, taken from what would have been his third autobiographical novel, Prakriti Junction. The second half of each chapter consists of oral history as told by William S. Burroughs, Allen Ginsberg, James Grauerholz, Anne Waldman, George Von Hilsheimer, and others, and additionally letters, mostly from son to father. These three separate mediums through which the story of the young man's life is told combine to create quite a touching and very realistic portrait. I have to say that the oral history consistently interested me the most, and the letters were sometimes tedious, as the previous information communicated had begun to sound repetitive. Burroughs Jr. is not a duplicitous autobiographer and 98% of the time his mind is sharp enough to recognize how absurd his outward physical behavior has become.
The first chapter charts his path from childhood through later education at the experimental Green Valley School, his subsequent arrests on drug charges and time spent at a rehab facility in Lexington, KY. The second chapter appears as if it will be the happiest, with the meeting of his wife Karen, their marriage, the publication of his first book Speed and the progress on his second book Kentucky Ham and various adventures traveling around the country that recall On the Road except with a far lesser degree of exuberance. By the end of the chapter, things are starting to look bleak. The third chapter is mostly a continuation in the vein of the second chapter, with an increased emphasis on Junior's alcoholic habits. He is pretty much a full-blown one throughout the entire part. The fourth chapter is undoubtedly the masterpiece section of this book, the most intriguing part, the most depressing part, and the most cathartic part.
The event which becomes the centerpiece of the book and Junior's life and death is the liver transplant he undergoes at age 28. There is question about how his liver had become so damaged at such a young age, even though he was an extremely heavy drinker. The consensus ends up being that, the drinking probably caused it, but there was probably another health concern that had caused it to occur so early. The operation for the transplant takes 18 hours and Burroughs Jr. reflects on the new appearance of his body:
"The wound, as I called it, was three inches across, eighteen inches long, and as deep as my backbone. I was gutted like a Halloween pig. I couldn't be stitched up because of the infection danger and had to heal from the inside out. When the nurse first saw it, she said, 'Oh my God!' Which scared me to death. Just what I needed. And it had to be washed out with saline at least three times a day and disinfected. Slosh it in with a squirting machine, suck it out with a vacuum machine. The first time I looked down at what they were doing, I said it, too: 'Oh my God!' I didn't look down there again for weeks." (121-122)
Burroughs Jr.'s new life after the operation last five years, and Allen Ginsberg remarked that he couldn't have lived much longer than seven years, that the new liver was constantly being rejected by his body so that he had to take steroids to reduce the rejection, which in turn affected Junior's psychological state, which had changed dramatically in his new, crippled condition. The end of the book is particularly hard to take, especially when the only disturbance between father and son rears its ugly head. Burroughs Jr. asked for $500 to buy a car in Denver, CO to help in finding a job and was not given the money. So he wrote a letter to his father that he never sent. This letter rivals Kafka's famous letter to his father.
There is also a page where Junior writes "pain" a couple hundred times, rivalling William Kotzwinkle's The Fan Man "dorky" page. Finally there is much talk of despair and suicide. Most moving at the end of Burroughs Jr.'s autobiographical contribution:
"There's no reason to think that my existence is of any value to anyone. (If I want visitors I usually have to call somebody and feign healthiness to get company.) I tried to give a party, but nobody was interested. I think that fairly soon I am finished, right or wrong--I simply cannot take it--and there's no reason left to try. This is as close to the real suicide note as I have come yet. I'm tired of beating around the bush. The only question left is how.
There hardly seemed any reason left to try to keep it up. I keep hoping that some of my letters, some of the things I've put into the world will bear fruit--but my faith is flagging. There is no money (it's a horror in itself that being without money can be a horror in itself. People actually hate you for it). More and more, I count myself amongst those who will die young, either by design or accident--in my case, probably by design. This is becoming an obsession and I cannot break away from it.
God, I am sick of people." (151)
Burroughs went on to live a few months longer, travelling to Florida to see an old classmate that had a crush on him before he became an item with Karen. He settled down there temporarily and died shortly thereafter from complications stemming from a heart attack. While he is not the literary giant his father is, his prose style will prove to be far more satisfying for the majority of readers interested in a coherent story with beginning, middle, and end. This is also an excellent depiction of William S. Burroughs the man, a caring father, but a very detached one, never washing his hands of his son, but obviously frustrated by the way he is blamed for every fault that his son developed. He was always supportive, from a distance, and the relationship is sometimes warmly felt in their letters--with the exception of the single aforementioned one. Taken in as a whole, this is an excellent document of a man that many probably did not know existed, and a heartbreaking story full of oftentimes gruesome details that reveal just how much suffering one person can be able to withstand.
They had lived together through the son's toddler years, and after the accidental shooting death of his wife, Burroughs sent his son to live with his parents in Palm Beach, Florida. After twelve or so years there, Burroughs the younger wanted to spend time with his father, so he flew to Tangier when he was 16 and witnessed the kind of life his father was leading there. One of the first things that happens is one of his father's friends makes sexual advances towards him. He gets used to it though, for a while at least, and smokes kif, and learns about his father's art. His description of the cut-up method is the one of the best I have read:
"I might mention that Mr. Gysin invented the cut-up method as applied to words or at least he was one of the first to take it seriously. The cut-up method enables the writer to achieve the same effect as the artist can with picture montage. The effect can be and often is shattering to the receptive reader because words are images in a much more personalized and internal sense than pictures. I recollect one mind-blowing ditty that my father had on his tape recorder. It was a word montage by Brion Gysin and consisted of one phrase: 'I come to free the words,' repeated over and over in different order. That is, 'The words are free to come, I come freely to the words, The free come to the words...' And while the words were repeated, the speed of the tape was increased gradually until it became a supersonic whine. But because of the rhythm, and after the cartoon laughter stage, some part of the listener would keep pace until he was virtually transported. To where, I don't know, or cannot report." (15)
I shouldn't attempt to lay down Junior's whole life story here. The book consists of four lengthy chapters which gradually will break one's heart. The first half of each chapter is Burroughs Jr.'s own writing, taken from what would have been his third autobiographical novel, Prakriti Junction. The second half of each chapter consists of oral history as told by William S. Burroughs, Allen Ginsberg, James Grauerholz, Anne Waldman, George Von Hilsheimer, and others, and additionally letters, mostly from son to father. These three separate mediums through which the story of the young man's life is told combine to create quite a touching and very realistic portrait. I have to say that the oral history consistently interested me the most, and the letters were sometimes tedious, as the previous information communicated had begun to sound repetitive. Burroughs Jr. is not a duplicitous autobiographer and 98% of the time his mind is sharp enough to recognize how absurd his outward physical behavior has become.
The first chapter charts his path from childhood through later education at the experimental Green Valley School, his subsequent arrests on drug charges and time spent at a rehab facility in Lexington, KY. The second chapter appears as if it will be the happiest, with the meeting of his wife Karen, their marriage, the publication of his first book Speed and the progress on his second book Kentucky Ham and various adventures traveling around the country that recall On the Road except with a far lesser degree of exuberance. By the end of the chapter, things are starting to look bleak. The third chapter is mostly a continuation in the vein of the second chapter, with an increased emphasis on Junior's alcoholic habits. He is pretty much a full-blown one throughout the entire part. The fourth chapter is undoubtedly the masterpiece section of this book, the most intriguing part, the most depressing part, and the most cathartic part.
The event which becomes the centerpiece of the book and Junior's life and death is the liver transplant he undergoes at age 28. There is question about how his liver had become so damaged at such a young age, even though he was an extremely heavy drinker. The consensus ends up being that, the drinking probably caused it, but there was probably another health concern that had caused it to occur so early. The operation for the transplant takes 18 hours and Burroughs Jr. reflects on the new appearance of his body:
"The wound, as I called it, was three inches across, eighteen inches long, and as deep as my backbone. I was gutted like a Halloween pig. I couldn't be stitched up because of the infection danger and had to heal from the inside out. When the nurse first saw it, she said, 'Oh my God!' Which scared me to death. Just what I needed. And it had to be washed out with saline at least three times a day and disinfected. Slosh it in with a squirting machine, suck it out with a vacuum machine. The first time I looked down at what they were doing, I said it, too: 'Oh my God!' I didn't look down there again for weeks." (121-122)
Burroughs Jr.'s new life after the operation last five years, and Allen Ginsberg remarked that he couldn't have lived much longer than seven years, that the new liver was constantly being rejected by his body so that he had to take steroids to reduce the rejection, which in turn affected Junior's psychological state, which had changed dramatically in his new, crippled condition. The end of the book is particularly hard to take, especially when the only disturbance between father and son rears its ugly head. Burroughs Jr. asked for $500 to buy a car in Denver, CO to help in finding a job and was not given the money. So he wrote a letter to his father that he never sent. This letter rivals Kafka's famous letter to his father.
There is also a page where Junior writes "pain" a couple hundred times, rivalling William Kotzwinkle's The Fan Man "dorky" page. Finally there is much talk of despair and suicide. Most moving at the end of Burroughs Jr.'s autobiographical contribution:
"There's no reason to think that my existence is of any value to anyone. (If I want visitors I usually have to call somebody and feign healthiness to get company.) I tried to give a party, but nobody was interested. I think that fairly soon I am finished, right or wrong--I simply cannot take it--and there's no reason left to try. This is as close to the real suicide note as I have come yet. I'm tired of beating around the bush. The only question left is how.
There hardly seemed any reason left to try to keep it up. I keep hoping that some of my letters, some of the things I've put into the world will bear fruit--but my faith is flagging. There is no money (it's a horror in itself that being without money can be a horror in itself. People actually hate you for it). More and more, I count myself amongst those who will die young, either by design or accident--in my case, probably by design. This is becoming an obsession and I cannot break away from it.
God, I am sick of people." (151)
Burroughs went on to live a few months longer, travelling to Florida to see an old classmate that had a crush on him before he became an item with Karen. He settled down there temporarily and died shortly thereafter from complications stemming from a heart attack. While he is not the literary giant his father is, his prose style will prove to be far more satisfying for the majority of readers interested in a coherent story with beginning, middle, and end. This is also an excellent depiction of William S. Burroughs the man, a caring father, but a very detached one, never washing his hands of his son, but obviously frustrated by the way he is blamed for every fault that his son developed. He was always supportive, from a distance, and the relationship is sometimes warmly felt in their letters--with the exception of the single aforementioned one. Taken in as a whole, this is an excellent document of a man that many probably did not know existed, and a heartbreaking story full of oftentimes gruesome details that reveal just how much suffering one person can be able to withstand.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Queer - William S. Burroughs
Amongst the Beats, you may find several reviews of Kerouac and Burroughs here, now and in the future, but probably not of Ginsberg. Don't get me wrong--I love Ginsberg--it's just I don't usually go for books of poetry. Poetry, for me, is best enjoyed with strong alcohol and a performance-friendly audience, neither of which I have significant access to at the moment. Enter Queer. Popular Burroughs biographical standards include mention of the difference between his early writing (Junky and Queer), his transitional work (Naked Lunch), and his settling into a motif (The Soft Machine, Nova Express, The Ticket that Exploded). Oeuvre rule: I have read Naked Lunch, The Soft Machine, and Interzone. Interzone is closer to the significantly more straightforward prose of Queer (or Junky, even if I haven't read it yet). And I actually preferred The Soft Machine to Naked Lunch because it seemed to be "going somewhere," as far as the "cut-up method" can. Queer is more satisfying than Interzone if you are interested in reading a story with a beginning, middle, and end, though it is atraditional in other ways.
One surprising thing about Queer that I didn't know: It was written in 1953, shortly after Junky, but not published until 1985. In the lengthy introduction (roughly 1/8 the length of the novel itself, which might even be called a "novella") Burroughs is disarmingly naked on several counts:
"My motivations to write Queer were more complex, and are not clear to me at the present time. Why should I wish to chronicle so carefully these extremely painful and unpleasant and lacerating memories? While it was I who wrote Junky, I feel that I was being written in Queer. I was also taking pains to ensure further writing, so as to set the record straight: writing as inoculation. As soon as something is written, it loses the power of surprise, just as a virus loses its advantage when a weakened virus has created alerted antibodies. So I achieved some immunity from further perilous ventures along these lines by writing my experience down." (xiv)
Also when he recounts the unearthing process:
"When I started to write this companion text to Queer, I was paralyzed with a heavy reluctance, a writer's block like a straitjacket: 'I glance at the manuscript of Queer and I feel I simply can't read it. My past was a poisoned river from which one was fortunate to escape, and by which one feels immediately threatened, years after the events recorded. --Painful to an extent I find it difficult to read, let alone to write about. Every word and gesture sets the teeth on edge.' The reason for this reluctance becomes clearer as I force myself to look: the book is motivated and formed by an event which is never mentioned, in fact is carefully avoided: the accidental shooting of my wife, Joan, in September 1951." (xvii-xviii)
The novel does not contain any self-loathing or apologies for homosexuality. There are a few random instances of the protagonist, Lee, meeting other males that are uninterested in pursuing their relationship beyond a general friendship, but there are very few depictions of outright homophobia. In the introduction, Burroughs writes that Lee is off junk, freshly sexualized, and in search of an appropriate object. He finds it in the person of Eugene Allerton, who is probably not queer, but who succumbs to Lee's advances for reasons that are not entirely clear to me. Most intriguing are the first few scenes when Lee meets Allerton, and the way in which he hopes to reveal that he wants to "make it" with him. The closest moment approaching bitter self-examination occurs in Lee's confession to Allerton:
"'A curse. Been in our family for generations. The Lees have always been perverts. I shall never forget the unspeakable horror that froze the lymph in my glands--the lymph glands that is, of course--when the baneful word seared my reeling brain: I was a homosexual. I thought of the painted, simpering female impersonators I had seen in a Baltimore night club. Could it be possible that I was one of those subhuman things? I walked the streets in a daze, like a man with a light concussion--just a minute, Doctor Kildare, this isn't your script. I might have well destroyed myself, ending an existence which seemed to offer nothing but grotesque misery and humiliation. Nobler, I thought, to die a man than live on, a sex monster. It was a wise old queen--Bobo, we called her--who taught me that I had a duty to live and to bear my burden proudly for all to see, to conquer prejudice and ignorance and hate with knowledge and sincerity and love. Whenever you are threatened by a hostile presence, you emit a thick cloud of love like an octopus squirts out ink.'" (39-40)
Passages like these push the novel into more classic territory than the majority of Burroughs work, which will never gain recognition beyond its cult literary following. The "cut-up method" is too much to take. It's not the same kind of reading people are used to doing. It doesn't make logical sense. It has no sense of "profluence." Queer should be read before the rest of Burroughs work to gain a sense of his philosophy.
Eventually, the novel becomes an adventure story, with Lee inviting Allerton on a trip to the jungles of South America in search of yage or ayahausca or Bannisteria caapi, a plant which contains a drug which supposedly enhances telepathic communication and makes mind control possible. Lee speaks about how the Russians and the Americans have probably already obtained the plant and have used it on their populaces for their societal aims. He hopes to use it to "have his way" with Allerton so that they can move beyond their predetermined schedule of "twice a week." This is the second half of the novel, and the first half is mostly about Lee going to various bars in Mexico City (much of the time, the Ship Ahoy, where Allerton hangs out with his friend Mary, playing chess), drinking and talking to various friends and eventually getting closer to Allerton, until a perceived split happens, with Allerton trying to avoid him more often than not, finally succumbing to the trip when Lee promises to pay for him all the way. The second half of the novel is stronger than the first, but on the whole this is a major work that is frequently overlooked, and is much more emotional and affecting than Burroughs later literary experiments. If one were to design a curriculum for a Queer Lit course, this volume would be a must.
One surprising thing about Queer that I didn't know: It was written in 1953, shortly after Junky, but not published until 1985. In the lengthy introduction (roughly 1/8 the length of the novel itself, which might even be called a "novella") Burroughs is disarmingly naked on several counts:
"My motivations to write Queer were more complex, and are not clear to me at the present time. Why should I wish to chronicle so carefully these extremely painful and unpleasant and lacerating memories? While it was I who wrote Junky, I feel that I was being written in Queer. I was also taking pains to ensure further writing, so as to set the record straight: writing as inoculation. As soon as something is written, it loses the power of surprise, just as a virus loses its advantage when a weakened virus has created alerted antibodies. So I achieved some immunity from further perilous ventures along these lines by writing my experience down." (xiv)
Also when he recounts the unearthing process:
"When I started to write this companion text to Queer, I was paralyzed with a heavy reluctance, a writer's block like a straitjacket: 'I glance at the manuscript of Queer and I feel I simply can't read it. My past was a poisoned river from which one was fortunate to escape, and by which one feels immediately threatened, years after the events recorded. --Painful to an extent I find it difficult to read, let alone to write about. Every word and gesture sets the teeth on edge.' The reason for this reluctance becomes clearer as I force myself to look: the book is motivated and formed by an event which is never mentioned, in fact is carefully avoided: the accidental shooting of my wife, Joan, in September 1951." (xvii-xviii)
The novel does not contain any self-loathing or apologies for homosexuality. There are a few random instances of the protagonist, Lee, meeting other males that are uninterested in pursuing their relationship beyond a general friendship, but there are very few depictions of outright homophobia. In the introduction, Burroughs writes that Lee is off junk, freshly sexualized, and in search of an appropriate object. He finds it in the person of Eugene Allerton, who is probably not queer, but who succumbs to Lee's advances for reasons that are not entirely clear to me. Most intriguing are the first few scenes when Lee meets Allerton, and the way in which he hopes to reveal that he wants to "make it" with him. The closest moment approaching bitter self-examination occurs in Lee's confession to Allerton:
"'A curse. Been in our family for generations. The Lees have always been perverts. I shall never forget the unspeakable horror that froze the lymph in my glands--the lymph glands that is, of course--when the baneful word seared my reeling brain: I was a homosexual. I thought of the painted, simpering female impersonators I had seen in a Baltimore night club. Could it be possible that I was one of those subhuman things? I walked the streets in a daze, like a man with a light concussion--just a minute, Doctor Kildare, this isn't your script. I might have well destroyed myself, ending an existence which seemed to offer nothing but grotesque misery and humiliation. Nobler, I thought, to die a man than live on, a sex monster. It was a wise old queen--Bobo, we called her--who taught me that I had a duty to live and to bear my burden proudly for all to see, to conquer prejudice and ignorance and hate with knowledge and sincerity and love. Whenever you are threatened by a hostile presence, you emit a thick cloud of love like an octopus squirts out ink.'" (39-40)
Passages like these push the novel into more classic territory than the majority of Burroughs work, which will never gain recognition beyond its cult literary following. The "cut-up method" is too much to take. It's not the same kind of reading people are used to doing. It doesn't make logical sense. It has no sense of "profluence." Queer should be read before the rest of Burroughs work to gain a sense of his philosophy.
Eventually, the novel becomes an adventure story, with Lee inviting Allerton on a trip to the jungles of South America in search of yage or ayahausca or Bannisteria caapi, a plant which contains a drug which supposedly enhances telepathic communication and makes mind control possible. Lee speaks about how the Russians and the Americans have probably already obtained the plant and have used it on their populaces for their societal aims. He hopes to use it to "have his way" with Allerton so that they can move beyond their predetermined schedule of "twice a week." This is the second half of the novel, and the first half is mostly about Lee going to various bars in Mexico City (much of the time, the Ship Ahoy, where Allerton hangs out with his friend Mary, playing chess), drinking and talking to various friends and eventually getting closer to Allerton, until a perceived split happens, with Allerton trying to avoid him more often than not, finally succumbing to the trip when Lee promises to pay for him all the way. The second half of the novel is stronger than the first, but on the whole this is a major work that is frequently overlooked, and is much more emotional and affecting than Burroughs later literary experiments. If one were to design a curriculum for a Queer Lit course, this volume would be a must.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian - Kurt Vonnegut
Published in 1999, two years after his final novel Timequake, God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian is more of an essay by Kurt Vonnegut than a book. When I took it out of the library, I expected an interview with Kevorkian or an impassioned defense of euthanasia. This is neither. Its 78 pages can be read in probably 30-45 minutes. It consists of an introduction, which reveals Vonnegut's methodology for the piece, and the essay itself, which is comprised of a dozen or so interviews with recent deaths of lesser-known folk showing up in the obituary column of The New York Times and more famous celebrities from the past like William Shakespeare and Sir Isaac Newton and Adolf Hitler and Isaac Asimov and Clarence Darrow. Vonnegut is induced into having near-death experiences by Jack Kevorkian in Huntsville, Texas, and reports back on the experience of being half dead and interviewing these people in the tunnel towards the Pearly Gates. There is no hell. St. Peter guards the gates and begins to get upset by all of this near-death visiting.
Each little chapter in the essay itself, usually between 1 and 3 pages, is, I believe, a report that Vonnegut delivered for New York City's NPR affiliate, WNYC. He exists as a character in this work in the guise of a reporter. Some of them are very funny. The interview with Peter Pellegrino, hot air balloon enthusiast, is my personal favorite. There is also a critique by a recently executed woman in Texas of the Governor at the time who presciently states, "She said that was too bad [that there was no Hell] because she would be glad to go to Hell if only she could take the Governor of Texas with her. 'He's a murderer, too, said Carla Faye. 'He murdered me.'" (70). This in 1998 or 1999.
All of the proceeds of this book went to the WNYC station so it was great for Vonnegut to do this as his own, probably very lucrative pledge drive. He does make a compelling statement about the nature of public radio: "WNYC enhances the informed wit and wisdom of its community and mine. It does what no commercial radio or TV station can afford to do anymore. WNYC satisfies the people's right to know--as contrasted with, as abject slaves of high-roller publicists and advertisers, keeping the public vacantly diverted and entertained." (12) While I support the efforts of public radio, I have never donated to a pledge drive and God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian might be a good way to support that NYC-affiliate station, but it comes at quite a high price for such a short book. That said, if you need to kill a half hour in a library or at your local massive bookstore, this would not be a bad thing to separate from the chaff. It's a cool idea for an essay and I almost wish Vonnegut had developed it further, but it's good the way it is, as an entertaining (and humanizing) little truc.
Each little chapter in the essay itself, usually between 1 and 3 pages, is, I believe, a report that Vonnegut delivered for New York City's NPR affiliate, WNYC. He exists as a character in this work in the guise of a reporter. Some of them are very funny. The interview with Peter Pellegrino, hot air balloon enthusiast, is my personal favorite. There is also a critique by a recently executed woman in Texas of the Governor at the time who presciently states, "She said that was too bad [that there was no Hell] because she would be glad to go to Hell if only she could take the Governor of Texas with her. 'He's a murderer, too, said Carla Faye. 'He murdered me.'" (70). This in 1998 or 1999.
All of the proceeds of this book went to the WNYC station so it was great for Vonnegut to do this as his own, probably very lucrative pledge drive. He does make a compelling statement about the nature of public radio: "WNYC enhances the informed wit and wisdom of its community and mine. It does what no commercial radio or TV station can afford to do anymore. WNYC satisfies the people's right to know--as contrasted with, as abject slaves of high-roller publicists and advertisers, keeping the public vacantly diverted and entertained." (12) While I support the efforts of public radio, I have never donated to a pledge drive and God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian might be a good way to support that NYC-affiliate station, but it comes at quite a high price for such a short book. That said, if you need to kill a half hour in a library or at your local massive bookstore, this would not be a bad thing to separate from the chaff. It's a cool idea for an essay and I almost wish Vonnegut had developed it further, but it's good the way it is, as an entertaining (and humanizing) little truc.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Snuff - Chuck Palahniuk
Snuff is the most recent novel by Chuck Palahniuk, released May 20, 2008, exactly five months ago today. The earlier comment, made in the review of Survivor, concerning the author's prolific output may be a bit of an exaggeration, though he has already announced details concerning his next novel to be released in 2009 on his website. I do expect to be able to read Pygmy after having finished the remaining volumes. You may be wondering why this Palahniuk obsession all of the sudden? Fact is, I'm coming up very soon on completing my second novel, and the idea of selling it (just printing it out, really) is so daunting to me that I have turned to this author as an example of what it takes to attain success in the modern literary marketplace. On the biographical note at the end of Snuff, it is stated that Palahniuk has sold over three million books. This on top of two movie deals, and at least two more forthcoming. To say that I wish I lived his life would be perfect honesty.
Granted, his fiction may not cast as wide a net as Philip Roth's--Snuff may be downright offensive in comparison to Portnoy's Complaint. But it really isn't so bad. I mean, for a book about the making of a world record breaking pornographic film, it is not really so shocking after the first 50 pages or so. There are at least two revelations concerning potential coital relations with paternal and maternal sources--and while that may be hard to swallow, so to speak, once all of the cliches of porn are exhausted, it becomes just another book about just another job. There are a couple things to mention. First, so far it is my least favorite book by Palahniuk, and I only recommend it if you don't care about reading something that can be considered a trifle. Not unlike A Long Way Down by Nick Hornby, one of the first items reviewed on this blog (except that volume might hold more intrinsic value), it makes for good "beach reading." That is, if you don't mind other beach goers perhaps thinking you are perverted (as someone who read Naked Lunch on beach visits six years ago, I do not worry about that). Second, it is also Palahniuk's shortest book, which is why I call it something of a trifle, and not anywhere near the heights of any of the previous books I've read by him. Rant, this book's direct predecessor, does not get off to as quick a start as this one, but there is a far greater payoff in the end. All things considered, the New York Times review of Snuff (which can be found here http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/08/books/review/Ellmann-t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) is more harsh than I am willing to be because the book is not as meaningless as Ellman makes it out to be.
One quick note before a discussion of the plot commences. A few weeks ago I heard a piece on NPR about how book publishers are increasingly releasing "trailers" for books. I can understand how this might be helpful in an age where digital cable and streaming Internet videos threaten to trump all other media. However, I believed that, if a person brought themselves into a bookstore, or a library, or randomly searched on Amazon.com, the descriptions of the books are enough reason to pick something out, or leave it. In other words, the notes on the inside covers, the blurbs from other famous authors, or in my world, the "hook" in the query letter (which is enough for agents to tell me, "That's not for me."). Well, if you go to the page for Snuff on Amazon.com, you will find one of these so-called trailers. It is the first one I have watched and it is most instructive for getting to see Chuck Palahniuk in person and to hear how his last name is pronounced (differently than I have been saying for years).
Snuff concerns five main characters: Ms. Cassie Wright, who is undoubtedly the main character, but who does not provide one of the four rotating first person narratives that comprise the novel, Mr. 600, Mr. 72., Mr. 137, and Sheila, the talent coordinator. The setting is one long scene. A concrete basement where 600 guys stand around in their boxers waiting to be called in, 3 at a time, to perform their duties with Ms. Wright and help her to set a new world record for the biggest gang bang of all time. Cassie Wright is a legendary porn star that has been in the business for about twenty years. Mr. 600 a.k.a. Branch Bacardi is her male equivalent, and co-star in many films. Mr. 72 a.k.a. Darin Johnson is an 18-year-old bearing roses and wearing a crucifix necklace who hopes to deliver a particular message to Ms. Wright. Mr. 137 a.k.a. Dan Banyan is a recently disgraced television actor who hopes to resuscitate his career by performing in a different kind of porno than the one from which he was "outed." Sheila is the 20-year-old who makes the pitch to Cassie for the film, and makes all of the preparations for its production.
There is not much of a plot to speak of--beyond the certain pills Mr. 137 keeps, the certain pill Mr. 600 keeps, and issues of paternity and maternity. Snuff is mostly an exhibition space for low-brow comedy, and I will admit that a few of the puns in the filmography of Cassie Wright (To Drill a Mockingbird, The Da Vinci Load, The Postman Always Cums Twice, Catch Her in the Eye, The Wizard of Ass) made me laugh out loud. However, it is also a meditation on the desperation and guilty feelings associated with the industry. There are not as many descriptive segments to excerpt as in other works by Palahniuk, but there are a couple that do identify this element in the novel. The laugh-it-off desperation:
"Even indoors like this, Bacardi, Cord Cuervo, Beamer Bushmills--all the male dinosaurs of the adult industry still wear their sunglasses. They pat and smooth their hair. They're the generation of genuine stage actors; they studied their craft at UCLA or NYU, but needed to pay the rent between legitimate roles. To them, doing porn was a lark. A radical political gesture. Playing the male lead in The Twilight Bone or A Tale of Two Titties was a joke to put on their resume. After they were bankable legitimate stars, those early jobs would become fodder for anecdotes they'd tell on late-night talk shows." (12-13)
And the chilling guilt:
"'It only takes one mistake,' the Dan Banyan guy says, 'and nothing else you ever do will matter.' With his empty hand, he takes one of my hands. His fingers feel hot, fever-hot, and pounding with his heartbeats. He turns my hand palm-up saying, 'No matter how hard you work or how smart you become, you'll always be known for that one poor choice.' He sets the blue pill on my palm, saying, 'Do that one wrong thing--and you'll be dead for the rest of your life.' (110-111)
Snuff is probably not going to be nominated for the National Book Award or the Pulitzer Prize or the PEN/Faulkner prize. (A side note on prizes: with recent mention of why American writers rarely win the Nobel--they supposedly don't understand the mechanics of literature as well as Europeans do--which I will agree on Thomas Mann about, but that's it--would it be appropriate to offer D.F. Wallace the Nobel posthumously, a la J.K. Toole for the Pulitzer? I vote yes. It is certainly the kind of story to keep the literary trade alive and appealing for future generations of would-be-mostly disappointed writers.) Palahniuk may have an even greater American novel than Fight Club in him yet, but this will rarely top the list of his oeuvre. It is, like I said, a trifle; easy and quick to read. I feel good having read it but I'm glad I got it out of the library--it's not a book I need to own.
Granted, his fiction may not cast as wide a net as Philip Roth's--Snuff may be downright offensive in comparison to Portnoy's Complaint. But it really isn't so bad. I mean, for a book about the making of a world record breaking pornographic film, it is not really so shocking after the first 50 pages or so. There are at least two revelations concerning potential coital relations with paternal and maternal sources--and while that may be hard to swallow, so to speak, once all of the cliches of porn are exhausted, it becomes just another book about just another job. There are a couple things to mention. First, so far it is my least favorite book by Palahniuk, and I only recommend it if you don't care about reading something that can be considered a trifle. Not unlike A Long Way Down by Nick Hornby, one of the first items reviewed on this blog (except that volume might hold more intrinsic value), it makes for good "beach reading." That is, if you don't mind other beach goers perhaps thinking you are perverted (as someone who read Naked Lunch on beach visits six years ago, I do not worry about that). Second, it is also Palahniuk's shortest book, which is why I call it something of a trifle, and not anywhere near the heights of any of the previous books I've read by him. Rant, this book's direct predecessor, does not get off to as quick a start as this one, but there is a far greater payoff in the end. All things considered, the New York Times review of Snuff (which can be found here http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/08/books/review/Ellmann-t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) is more harsh than I am willing to be because the book is not as meaningless as Ellman makes it out to be.
One quick note before a discussion of the plot commences. A few weeks ago I heard a piece on NPR about how book publishers are increasingly releasing "trailers" for books. I can understand how this might be helpful in an age where digital cable and streaming Internet videos threaten to trump all other media. However, I believed that, if a person brought themselves into a bookstore, or a library, or randomly searched on Amazon.com, the descriptions of the books are enough reason to pick something out, or leave it. In other words, the notes on the inside covers, the blurbs from other famous authors, or in my world, the "hook" in the query letter (which is enough for agents to tell me, "That's not for me."). Well, if you go to the page for Snuff on Amazon.com, you will find one of these so-called trailers. It is the first one I have watched and it is most instructive for getting to see Chuck Palahniuk in person and to hear how his last name is pronounced (differently than I have been saying for years).
Snuff concerns five main characters: Ms. Cassie Wright, who is undoubtedly the main character, but who does not provide one of the four rotating first person narratives that comprise the novel, Mr. 600, Mr. 72., Mr. 137, and Sheila, the talent coordinator. The setting is one long scene. A concrete basement where 600 guys stand around in their boxers waiting to be called in, 3 at a time, to perform their duties with Ms. Wright and help her to set a new world record for the biggest gang bang of all time. Cassie Wright is a legendary porn star that has been in the business for about twenty years. Mr. 600 a.k.a. Branch Bacardi is her male equivalent, and co-star in many films. Mr. 72 a.k.a. Darin Johnson is an 18-year-old bearing roses and wearing a crucifix necklace who hopes to deliver a particular message to Ms. Wright. Mr. 137 a.k.a. Dan Banyan is a recently disgraced television actor who hopes to resuscitate his career by performing in a different kind of porno than the one from which he was "outed." Sheila is the 20-year-old who makes the pitch to Cassie for the film, and makes all of the preparations for its production.
There is not much of a plot to speak of--beyond the certain pills Mr. 137 keeps, the certain pill Mr. 600 keeps, and issues of paternity and maternity. Snuff is mostly an exhibition space for low-brow comedy, and I will admit that a few of the puns in the filmography of Cassie Wright (To Drill a Mockingbird, The Da Vinci Load, The Postman Always Cums Twice, Catch Her in the Eye, The Wizard of Ass) made me laugh out loud. However, it is also a meditation on the desperation and guilty feelings associated with the industry. There are not as many descriptive segments to excerpt as in other works by Palahniuk, but there are a couple that do identify this element in the novel. The laugh-it-off desperation:
"Even indoors like this, Bacardi, Cord Cuervo, Beamer Bushmills--all the male dinosaurs of the adult industry still wear their sunglasses. They pat and smooth their hair. They're the generation of genuine stage actors; they studied their craft at UCLA or NYU, but needed to pay the rent between legitimate roles. To them, doing porn was a lark. A radical political gesture. Playing the male lead in The Twilight Bone or A Tale of Two Titties was a joke to put on their resume. After they were bankable legitimate stars, those early jobs would become fodder for anecdotes they'd tell on late-night talk shows." (12-13)
And the chilling guilt:
"'It only takes one mistake,' the Dan Banyan guy says, 'and nothing else you ever do will matter.' With his empty hand, he takes one of my hands. His fingers feel hot, fever-hot, and pounding with his heartbeats. He turns my hand palm-up saying, 'No matter how hard you work or how smart you become, you'll always be known for that one poor choice.' He sets the blue pill on my palm, saying, 'Do that one wrong thing--and you'll be dead for the rest of your life.' (110-111)
Snuff is probably not going to be nominated for the National Book Award or the Pulitzer Prize or the PEN/Faulkner prize. (A side note on prizes: with recent mention of why American writers rarely win the Nobel--they supposedly don't understand the mechanics of literature as well as Europeans do--which I will agree on Thomas Mann about, but that's it--would it be appropriate to offer D.F. Wallace the Nobel posthumously, a la J.K. Toole for the Pulitzer? I vote yes. It is certainly the kind of story to keep the literary trade alive and appealing for future generations of would-be-mostly disappointed writers.) Palahniuk may have an even greater American novel than Fight Club in him yet, but this will rarely top the list of his oeuvre. It is, like I said, a trifle; easy and quick to read. I feel good having read it but I'm glad I got it out of the library--it's not a book I need to own.
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Infanticide
"Infanticide" a story 1,316 words in length, is an idea that came to me last night. True, this story may disturb some due to certain details which may coincide with the author's own life, but rest assured it is a totally fictional, comic piece. I feel it is of similar success to "Visitation" but that neither is quite up to snuff for the Writer's Digest competition. Comments would be appreciated.
Infanticide
By Christopher J. Knorps
He couldn’t get a job. I had given him a job before, and he had made good money. But then he went and blew it all on his Hollywood dreams. Writing. Acting. Modeling. Playing in a band. I don’t even want to say how much he left with. A few months ago he started calling me. Dad, dad, I’m going broke, I’m dying out here, can I come home? Of course he could come home. We had extra room. I wasn’t about to go abandon a son.
The first month wasn’t so bad. I kept telling him there was no pressure on him to get a job. Never mind that my own business wasn’t doing so hot. We had enough to survive.
The second month he started to get depressed. The only time I really saw him was at the dinner table. The rest of the time he would be up in his room, on his computer, ostensibly sending out resumes.
One night at dinner, I asked him why he didn’t go out with some nice girl who lived nearby.
“Leo, why don’t you go see her? She would love to hear from you again.”
“I can’t go talk to her when I’m in this state, Dad. It’s pathetic. I live with my parents. I don’t have a job.”
“Well, you can go work as a substitute teacher,” my wife Susan suggested. This did not sit will with Leo and he uttered more disparaging remarks.
“Nobody’s ever going to hire me! I make horrible first impressions. I have no appreciable skills to offer a business. I won’t work for minimum wage,” he said, losing his temper.
“And I don’t think you should work for minimum wage, either,” I said by way of agreement.
“I just wish I could kill myself.”
I never liked it when he went there.
“Oh, shut up already!” I said.
“I wish you guys would kill me because I’m such a disappointment to you,” he said. “I just wish I were dead.”
He stayed quiet and sullen the rest of the meal as if to validate his own statements by refusing to cheer up. He went upstairs to his room and my wife and I sat at the table.
“Maybe we should kill him.” I said.
“Roger, don’t be funny about that,” she said.
“He hates being here. He hates living at home. He’s not going to find a job. I know he’s never going to amount to anything.” I started facetiously listing, the wine we had drunk making me silly.
“Roger, really! We should be thinking of ways to help him. He’s an intelligent and capable person.”
“Who is stuck in a shit-bag economy along with us and who will undoubtedly ask us to pay for law school for him which will then prevent us from enjoying the sort of retirement we deserve.”
“Look,” Susan said, “It’s our fault he’s not doing well for himself. It’s some mistake we made in raising him. We have to help him along the best we can.”
“He doesn’t want to be helped! He’s been on his own and all he’s been able to do is make himself broke! Even if we paid for him to go to law school, he probably would end up right back here with us! I vote to kill him.”
“Roger why don’t you just go over there, turn on the TV, and relax. You’re not making sense.”
“He said himself he wished we could kill him! Don’t you see—he’s cursed—he’s an appendage we will have to drag along with us for the rest of our days—and then he would probably just off himself once we died because he can’t take care of himself!”
Susan cleaned up the table and I watched TV. My idea wasn’t so crazy after all. I knew I had something here.
The next day I knocked on Leo’s door. He was sitting on his bed with his laptop in front of him. He minimized a few different windows when I opened the door.
“What is it?” he asked.
“I’ve been thinking about what you said, last night,” I said, sitting on his bed, “And if you really want us to kill you, I would be willing to do it. Your mother is a bit against the idea, but if we go up to her together, I think we can convince her.”
Leo closed his laptop, moved over to me and hugged me. These were the sort of feelings of love I was hoping to get out of having a son.
“I’m so glad you believed me,” he said, “I’ve just been going this last month knowing I’m no good, knowing nothing was ever going to be good for me in my life again. Thank you for considering alternatives.”
We walked downstairs and found my wife in the laundry room.
“Susan, our son has agreed to my plan.”
“Oh sweetie,” she said to Leo, “Are you sure this is what you want?”
“I’m positive, Mom. Everybody talks about how bad it is being dead. But it’s nothing compared to the way I feel going out, interviewing, trying to meet new people and convince them I’m not a loser.”
“I feel like we’re making a big mistake!” Susan said to me.
“Trust me, Mom,” Leo said, “I’m just a big waste of money and I’ll just be an even bigger waste of money.”
“A quarter million already down the hole,” I said, “And it just doesn’t pay to be one more superfluous human being at this stage of the game. Better to be dead and see if there is a more pleasant afterlife.”
On Halloween, we decided to hang our son. We would then surreptitiously hang him from a tree outside, so that it would appear that he had committed a public suicide as a way to scare trick-or-treaters. I looked up on the internet how to tie a noose. Susan and Leo and I walked down to the basement and found a pipe to hang it from.
“Go on my computer and look at all of the documents when this is over. You’ll be able to find a lot of suicide notes. I wrote them all the time. That’s good enough evidence for you.” Leo said.
“I’ll miss you so much Leo!” Susan said, giving him a huge hug.
“I’m going to miss you too!” I said, joining them.
“It’s okay,” Leo said, “It’s better for everyone this way.”
And with that we placed the noose around his neck, tightened it, had him step up onto a chair, told him to say hi to his grandparents for us, and pulled the chair out from under him. Susan screamed and looked away and put her face in her hands.
“What have we done!” she said.
We carried his body out to a tree. There were some trick-or-treaters going around so we waited until they were out of view and tied the rope around a tree. There Leo hung, dead.
That night the police discovered his body and asked us why we hadn’t noticed it yet. We said our driveway came up on the other side of our house, and we never drove past that tree, and we just thought Leo had gone out late to a Halloween party and stayed at a friend’s house overnight. We cried. We were very good actors. We told the policemen he was a very sad young man. We looked at the documents on the computer and pointed out the various suicide notes that Leo had written over the previous weeks, and indeed, years. They had all been dated meticulously. No one ever suspected a thing.
With this pleasant thought in our minds, Susan and I thought about the several hundred thousand dollars more we had saved, and began to research exotic vacation destinations.
Infanticide
By Christopher J. Knorps
He couldn’t get a job. I had given him a job before, and he had made good money. But then he went and blew it all on his Hollywood dreams. Writing. Acting. Modeling. Playing in a band. I don’t even want to say how much he left with. A few months ago he started calling me. Dad, dad, I’m going broke, I’m dying out here, can I come home? Of course he could come home. We had extra room. I wasn’t about to go abandon a son.
The first month wasn’t so bad. I kept telling him there was no pressure on him to get a job. Never mind that my own business wasn’t doing so hot. We had enough to survive.
The second month he started to get depressed. The only time I really saw him was at the dinner table. The rest of the time he would be up in his room, on his computer, ostensibly sending out resumes.
One night at dinner, I asked him why he didn’t go out with some nice girl who lived nearby.
“Leo, why don’t you go see her? She would love to hear from you again.”
“I can’t go talk to her when I’m in this state, Dad. It’s pathetic. I live with my parents. I don’t have a job.”
“Well, you can go work as a substitute teacher,” my wife Susan suggested. This did not sit will with Leo and he uttered more disparaging remarks.
“Nobody’s ever going to hire me! I make horrible first impressions. I have no appreciable skills to offer a business. I won’t work for minimum wage,” he said, losing his temper.
“And I don’t think you should work for minimum wage, either,” I said by way of agreement.
“I just wish I could kill myself.”
I never liked it when he went there.
“Oh, shut up already!” I said.
“I wish you guys would kill me because I’m such a disappointment to you,” he said. “I just wish I were dead.”
He stayed quiet and sullen the rest of the meal as if to validate his own statements by refusing to cheer up. He went upstairs to his room and my wife and I sat at the table.
“Maybe we should kill him.” I said.
“Roger, don’t be funny about that,” she said.
“He hates being here. He hates living at home. He’s not going to find a job. I know he’s never going to amount to anything.” I started facetiously listing, the wine we had drunk making me silly.
“Roger, really! We should be thinking of ways to help him. He’s an intelligent and capable person.”
“Who is stuck in a shit-bag economy along with us and who will undoubtedly ask us to pay for law school for him which will then prevent us from enjoying the sort of retirement we deserve.”
“Look,” Susan said, “It’s our fault he’s not doing well for himself. It’s some mistake we made in raising him. We have to help him along the best we can.”
“He doesn’t want to be helped! He’s been on his own and all he’s been able to do is make himself broke! Even if we paid for him to go to law school, he probably would end up right back here with us! I vote to kill him.”
“Roger why don’t you just go over there, turn on the TV, and relax. You’re not making sense.”
“He said himself he wished we could kill him! Don’t you see—he’s cursed—he’s an appendage we will have to drag along with us for the rest of our days—and then he would probably just off himself once we died because he can’t take care of himself!”
Susan cleaned up the table and I watched TV. My idea wasn’t so crazy after all. I knew I had something here.
The next day I knocked on Leo’s door. He was sitting on his bed with his laptop in front of him. He minimized a few different windows when I opened the door.
“What is it?” he asked.
“I’ve been thinking about what you said, last night,” I said, sitting on his bed, “And if you really want us to kill you, I would be willing to do it. Your mother is a bit against the idea, but if we go up to her together, I think we can convince her.”
Leo closed his laptop, moved over to me and hugged me. These were the sort of feelings of love I was hoping to get out of having a son.
“I’m so glad you believed me,” he said, “I’ve just been going this last month knowing I’m no good, knowing nothing was ever going to be good for me in my life again. Thank you for considering alternatives.”
We walked downstairs and found my wife in the laundry room.
“Susan, our son has agreed to my plan.”
“Oh sweetie,” she said to Leo, “Are you sure this is what you want?”
“I’m positive, Mom. Everybody talks about how bad it is being dead. But it’s nothing compared to the way I feel going out, interviewing, trying to meet new people and convince them I’m not a loser.”
“I feel like we’re making a big mistake!” Susan said to me.
“Trust me, Mom,” Leo said, “I’m just a big waste of money and I’ll just be an even bigger waste of money.”
“A quarter million already down the hole,” I said, “And it just doesn’t pay to be one more superfluous human being at this stage of the game. Better to be dead and see if there is a more pleasant afterlife.”
On Halloween, we decided to hang our son. We would then surreptitiously hang him from a tree outside, so that it would appear that he had committed a public suicide as a way to scare trick-or-treaters. I looked up on the internet how to tie a noose. Susan and Leo and I walked down to the basement and found a pipe to hang it from.
“Go on my computer and look at all of the documents when this is over. You’ll be able to find a lot of suicide notes. I wrote them all the time. That’s good enough evidence for you.” Leo said.
“I’ll miss you so much Leo!” Susan said, giving him a huge hug.
“I’m going to miss you too!” I said, joining them.
“It’s okay,” Leo said, “It’s better for everyone this way.”
And with that we placed the noose around his neck, tightened it, had him step up onto a chair, told him to say hi to his grandparents for us, and pulled the chair out from under him. Susan screamed and looked away and put her face in her hands.
“What have we done!” she said.
We carried his body out to a tree. There were some trick-or-treaters going around so we waited until they were out of view and tied the rope around a tree. There Leo hung, dead.
That night the police discovered his body and asked us why we hadn’t noticed it yet. We said our driveway came up on the other side of our house, and we never drove past that tree, and we just thought Leo had gone out late to a Halloween party and stayed at a friend’s house overnight. We cried. We were very good actors. We told the policemen he was a very sad young man. We looked at the documents on the computer and pointed out the various suicide notes that Leo had written over the previous weeks, and indeed, years. They had all been dated meticulously. No one ever suspected a thing.
With this pleasant thought in our minds, Susan and I thought about the several hundred thousand dollars more we had saved, and began to research exotic vacation destinations.
Black Postcards - Dean Wareham
Anecdote #1: Sometime in mid-November 2007, I went into a hair salon in West Hollywood. One of my co-workers told me to see his stylist for a hair cut, since I had been talking about how I needed to get one. He told me that he would pay for the hair cut and I could just pay for the tip. It was very generous of him. I had to wait a few minutes and leafed through a copy of Men's Vogue and saw that there was a piece in the magazine by Dean Wareham. I read an essay by him about how he was cheating on his wife with his new female bandmate. I only knew Wareham by Galaxie 500 but in reading this article I found out he was also in the band called Luna. I was impressed with the emotion of the piece. It was very heartfelt, almost too poetic for a mass-market magazine in a hair salon. It also felt very personal to be reading an article in a magazine like that by a guy that I would presume many, many people would not recognize by name. I had loved the albums I had gotten by Galaxie 500 and it seemed very special to be reading this article in quite a glamorous magazine by a guy that I presumed to be a low-key indie rocker.
I didn't realize then that the article was an excerpt from Wareham's forthcoming memoir, Black Postcards, (specifically, the chapter entitled "The Dorm Room Jukebox," which is about a party in a UMASS dorm room after a Luna show there in 2001, and how it was Wareham's first exposure to the Napster culture of music file-sharing) and when I read a few notable mentions of the book in the months afterwards, notably, Mac McCaughan's (which you can find on the link to the Portastatic blog), I decided to put it on my list of things to read. I don't have anything negative to say about it except that it inflamed my jealousy of the man. True, the picture Wareham paints is far from the ideal image of the rich, excessive rock star, but still, he had way more fun than I, or probably anyone else I've known, ever had. Plus, when he offers up this compliment to the normal, everyday working, professionally made person:
"His [Sean Eden, Luna guitarist] sister was married to a lawyer. Or a doctor. One of those. They had two children. Other people, people who are not in rock bands, have real lives--lives of quiet accumulation, 401K accounts, Roth IRAs, college funds, retirement funds, and health insurance." (310)
I do not feel the least bit worthy of any kind of respect. Reading this book made me depressed in the sense that it made me realize how few of my dreams have been realized, and indeed how they may never be realized. So I was very jealous of Wareham for the majority of the reading. But I could not stop. The easiest way to explain it is, it reads like a very long chapter out of Our Band Could Be Your Life, except the chapter isn't about Galaxie 500, and it's not going to stop when Luna signs to a major label deal. Let me point something out: I've never listened to Luna. If it is a crime to review this book without any knowledge of the band's sound or catalog, then I would like to offer up my guilty plea. I will say that it made me want to go out and buy a few Luna records (Penthouse and Rendezvous and Pup Tent are made to sound quite interesting), and maybe that is one of the hidden motives of the book--to sell more old records. But Wareham wouldn't be that shallow. Or, maybe he would. The fact is, he is an excellent writer of prose, and this memoir stands on its own perhaps better than any other piece of musician autobiography I've ever read. That said I haven't read many. I've been dying for months to read Mark E. Smith's autobiography, Renegade, but that is probably something I will have to ask for from Santa Claus.
But getting back to my point, I have never listened to Luna, and so perhaps the majority of the book was not as enjoyable to me as it could have been. I'm probably stepping out on a huge ledge here by making this statement: Wareham will be remembered more for Galaxie 500 than for Luna. Galaxie 500 is the stuff of legend, and Luna is the stuff of being in an everyday ordinary rock band. There are 3 Galaxie 500 albums and 7 Luna albums. Wareham makes the point that Luna was a better live band. That may be so, and I haven't really listened to them (this is why I'm stepping out on a huge ledge), but the Galaxie 500 albums, of which I have all 3, are pretty much as close to perfect as you can get, and I just can't imagine the Luna albums being held to the same high standard of consistency. Today is an astonishingly good debut, trim and focused like a laser beam. On Fire is their classic, long, bloated masterpiece that favors an excess of fantastic sad songs over an efficacious running time. And This is Our Music sounds like a perfect mix of the first two--their career catalog and trajectory is almost like the description Vladimir Nabokov gives of his own work: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
Though Wareham does not namedrop Nabokov, he is extremely well read and drops Thomas Mann, Goethe, Murakami, Kundera, Andre Breton, Gogol, Malraux, E.M. Forster, and Kant, whom he admits he didn't understand:
"I took a course on Kant's Transcendental Deduction when I was a sophomore at Harvard. We spent the whole semester going over twenty crucial pages, and now I couldn't for the life of me tell you what it was about. What a waste of my parent's money." (204)
I do believe one of the finest points he makes on art comes in his description of the Luna song, "Hedgehog"--chosen as the second single off of Penthouse:
"'It's always the song you like the least,' she said, 'that will be picked as the single.'
The smart guys in the alternative radio department chose 'Hedgehog,' track nine. It's not that we didn't like the song. We just thought it was the worst of the ten on our album. We had buried it at track nine, where you put the weakest song (the final track on an album should be a good one). They identified 'Hedgehog' as the most alternative sounding song on the record, being that it was short and slightly aggressive. Maybe the program director would think that Luna was grunge.
It's no fun, it's no fun
Reading fortune cookies to yourself
Are you a fox or a hedgehog?
Do you care anymore?
Wasting time, wasting time, wasting time all the while
I don't know what they're sayin', but I hate it anyway
I borrowed that fox/hedgehog opposition from Isaiah Berlin's famous essay, feeling pretty sure he wouldn't come after me.
'The fox knows many things,' wrote Berlin, 'but the hedgehog knows one big thing.' Some artists are foxes: Aristotle, Pushkin, Goethe, Picasso, Paul McCartney, Beck--they can do all kinds of dazzling things. But others are hedgehogs--Hegel, Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Jackson Pollock, and Keith Richards. They stick with one idea." (139-140)
But Wareham is definitely not an art snob. He also talks about going out to see Darkman and Resident Evil: Apocalypse at foreign movie theaters, and watching Shallow Hal and I, Robot on hotel room televisions, and also going to see Erin Brockovich. He also talks very candidly about his drug use. He doesn't talk so much about pot as we can pretty much safely presume that basically everyone who is a musician or affiliated with musicians smokes pot as a foundational element to chemicals. He never talks about being a pothead himself though, and I kind of doubt he could be, with all of the foreign touring and border crossing and random searching. He does however liberally mention use of coke and a surprising amount of ecstasy, which other people are always giving the band. There are not really any personal stories about addiction of his own that make this book lurid--obviously the most lurid parts are his depictions of his faithlessness to his wife Claudia. Most of the time I am hung up by the fact that Dean Wareham makes himself seem so cool by writing very matter-of-factly about his life, and all the things that happened in it. Were I to write a memoir (IF I am to write a memoir???), it would be filled with infinitely more pathetic stories. So I have to excerpt a part from my favorite chapter "The Herbertstrasse," because it was the only time when Wareham doesn't seem to care at all about making himself seem cool:
"I said goodbye to Lee, Justin, and Sean, and followed my new friend upstairs. She took me to her little rented room and told me to take off all my clothes and sit on the bed while she put on some music--the Spice Girls' 'Spice Up Your Life.' She left me alone for a minute. I sat there feeling naked and vulnerable. My friend returned wearing only panties and a bra and said that for another DM 50 she would take her clothes off, too, and wouldn't that be nicer? She was being very gentle with me.
She knelt on the bed next to me and applied the condom. What happened next happened too quickly. I was very excited, and the motion of her hands applying the condom was enough to make me come immediately. Scheisse. Premature.
'Schade,' she said, which translates, 'It's a shame.'
That was that. I got dressed quickly.
The whole experience was disappointing. Sex isn't much fun when you have to pay for it. There was no sweet kiss, no lingering over the moment. I'm not sure if that encounter qualified as sex at all. I felt like I had just paid too much for a falafel sandwich, a disappointing meal at a tourist trap." (186-187)
To me, this is what great writing is all about. Admitting things that you won't admit anywhere else except on the page. Putting it out there for everyone to read and not being scared by what anybody would think about you afterwards. I feel bad quoting what must be the most lurid portion of the book, but it is an example of why Black Postcards is great: Wareham has the right attitude about memoir-writing.
I said before there is not a personal story about addiction, but there is a mini-biography provided in the way of Wareham's friend and A & R representative for Elektra records, Terry Tolkin. The early chapters on his friendship with Tolkin are some of the most moving chapters of the entire book. Tolkin had run away from home in Rockland county when he was sixteen to New York where he sold acid and worked as a prostitute and eventually got into punk rock through an older boyfriend that he lived with in 1978 who lived around the corner from CBGB. Around this same time, Wareham himself was living in New York, going to the private Dalton High School, and being a "part-time punk," seeing Richard Hell and the Voidoids as his first show. But Tolkin eventually worked at the record store 99 Records, which then formed a label, which then signed a bunch of prominent no-wave bands, and finally Tolkin started booking Big Black and the Butthole Surfers. By the time he is working with and befriending Dean in Luna and going on tours with them, he's making a six-figure salary working out of Rockefeller Plaza and doing copious amounts of drugs. I might as well spoil what happened to him as I've spoiled so many other parts of the book, but I would just say, Terry Tolkin is one of the most evocatively drawn characters to come out from this work.
There's probably a lot else to mention about Black Postcards, like all of the musical celebrities Wareham meets, but at the end of the day, the best audience for this book are those that have dreams of being in their own indie rock band. I have pretty much given up on my own dreams in that field because I have zero guitar playing ability and I never worked very hard to practice at it. No, the inarguably more difficult (and crowded) field of literature is my dream, and typing is never something I will find overly difficult. Fortunately for Wareham, he can do both. Fans of Galaxie 500 and Luna and....Dean and Britta....will love this book and anybody with a passing interest in indie rock will find practically every question they could ever have answered.
Anecdote #2:
Shortly before I left Chicago for L.A., I saw that Dean and Britta were playing Schuba's, a bar and rock club in Chicago a short distance from my apartment. I convinced my roommate to go with me even though I had not shoved the Galaxie 500 albums I had down his throat like the other bands I made him go with me to see. This was probably going to be a pretty high cover for the show, and we went to Schuba's, just to see what the scene was like, to see if we were there before they went on. I said if we were there and they had already been on for thirty minutes, we wouldn't go in. Schuba's has a set-up where you can hang out at the bar, and then they have a pair of doors where a bouncer sits and stamps your hand for admission. Well, we were standing near the door, and the bouncer stepped away for a moment, and my roommate mischeviously just pushed the door open, and we were in for free! No one noticed and the set was great. I enjoyed hearing all the new songs by Dean and Britta, and they closed out their set with the great Galaxie 500 song "Tugboat" and I heard a bunch of people in the audience going "Shhhh. Tugboat," like they had to call attention to the song. It's definitely a special memory in my eight-year-history of concert going.
I didn't realize then that the article was an excerpt from Wareham's forthcoming memoir, Black Postcards, (specifically, the chapter entitled "The Dorm Room Jukebox," which is about a party in a UMASS dorm room after a Luna show there in 2001, and how it was Wareham's first exposure to the Napster culture of music file-sharing) and when I read a few notable mentions of the book in the months afterwards, notably, Mac McCaughan's (which you can find on the link to the Portastatic blog), I decided to put it on my list of things to read. I don't have anything negative to say about it except that it inflamed my jealousy of the man. True, the picture Wareham paints is far from the ideal image of the rich, excessive rock star, but still, he had way more fun than I, or probably anyone else I've known, ever had. Plus, when he offers up this compliment to the normal, everyday working, professionally made person:
"His [Sean Eden, Luna guitarist] sister was married to a lawyer. Or a doctor. One of those. They had two children. Other people, people who are not in rock bands, have real lives--lives of quiet accumulation, 401K accounts, Roth IRAs, college funds, retirement funds, and health insurance." (310)
I do not feel the least bit worthy of any kind of respect. Reading this book made me depressed in the sense that it made me realize how few of my dreams have been realized, and indeed how they may never be realized. So I was very jealous of Wareham for the majority of the reading. But I could not stop. The easiest way to explain it is, it reads like a very long chapter out of Our Band Could Be Your Life, except the chapter isn't about Galaxie 500, and it's not going to stop when Luna signs to a major label deal. Let me point something out: I've never listened to Luna. If it is a crime to review this book without any knowledge of the band's sound or catalog, then I would like to offer up my guilty plea. I will say that it made me want to go out and buy a few Luna records (Penthouse and Rendezvous and Pup Tent are made to sound quite interesting), and maybe that is one of the hidden motives of the book--to sell more old records. But Wareham wouldn't be that shallow. Or, maybe he would. The fact is, he is an excellent writer of prose, and this memoir stands on its own perhaps better than any other piece of musician autobiography I've ever read. That said I haven't read many. I've been dying for months to read Mark E. Smith's autobiography, Renegade, but that is probably something I will have to ask for from Santa Claus.
But getting back to my point, I have never listened to Luna, and so perhaps the majority of the book was not as enjoyable to me as it could have been. I'm probably stepping out on a huge ledge here by making this statement: Wareham will be remembered more for Galaxie 500 than for Luna. Galaxie 500 is the stuff of legend, and Luna is the stuff of being in an everyday ordinary rock band. There are 3 Galaxie 500 albums and 7 Luna albums. Wareham makes the point that Luna was a better live band. That may be so, and I haven't really listened to them (this is why I'm stepping out on a huge ledge), but the Galaxie 500 albums, of which I have all 3, are pretty much as close to perfect as you can get, and I just can't imagine the Luna albums being held to the same high standard of consistency. Today is an astonishingly good debut, trim and focused like a laser beam. On Fire is their classic, long, bloated masterpiece that favors an excess of fantastic sad songs over an efficacious running time. And This is Our Music sounds like a perfect mix of the first two--their career catalog and trajectory is almost like the description Vladimir Nabokov gives of his own work: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
Though Wareham does not namedrop Nabokov, he is extremely well read and drops Thomas Mann, Goethe, Murakami, Kundera, Andre Breton, Gogol, Malraux, E.M. Forster, and Kant, whom he admits he didn't understand:
"I took a course on Kant's Transcendental Deduction when I was a sophomore at Harvard. We spent the whole semester going over twenty crucial pages, and now I couldn't for the life of me tell you what it was about. What a waste of my parent's money." (204)
I do believe one of the finest points he makes on art comes in his description of the Luna song, "Hedgehog"--chosen as the second single off of Penthouse:
"'It's always the song you like the least,' she said, 'that will be picked as the single.'
The smart guys in the alternative radio department chose 'Hedgehog,' track nine. It's not that we didn't like the song. We just thought it was the worst of the ten on our album. We had buried it at track nine, where you put the weakest song (the final track on an album should be a good one). They identified 'Hedgehog' as the most alternative sounding song on the record, being that it was short and slightly aggressive. Maybe the program director would think that Luna was grunge.
It's no fun, it's no fun
Reading fortune cookies to yourself
Are you a fox or a hedgehog?
Do you care anymore?
Wasting time, wasting time, wasting time all the while
I don't know what they're sayin', but I hate it anyway
I borrowed that fox/hedgehog opposition from Isaiah Berlin's famous essay, feeling pretty sure he wouldn't come after me.
'The fox knows many things,' wrote Berlin, 'but the hedgehog knows one big thing.' Some artists are foxes: Aristotle, Pushkin, Goethe, Picasso, Paul McCartney, Beck--they can do all kinds of dazzling things. But others are hedgehogs--Hegel, Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Jackson Pollock, and Keith Richards. They stick with one idea." (139-140)
But Wareham is definitely not an art snob. He also talks about going out to see Darkman and Resident Evil: Apocalypse at foreign movie theaters, and watching Shallow Hal and I, Robot on hotel room televisions, and also going to see Erin Brockovich. He also talks very candidly about his drug use. He doesn't talk so much about pot as we can pretty much safely presume that basically everyone who is a musician or affiliated with musicians smokes pot as a foundational element to chemicals. He never talks about being a pothead himself though, and I kind of doubt he could be, with all of the foreign touring and border crossing and random searching. He does however liberally mention use of coke and a surprising amount of ecstasy, which other people are always giving the band. There are not really any personal stories about addiction of his own that make this book lurid--obviously the most lurid parts are his depictions of his faithlessness to his wife Claudia. Most of the time I am hung up by the fact that Dean Wareham makes himself seem so cool by writing very matter-of-factly about his life, and all the things that happened in it. Were I to write a memoir (IF I am to write a memoir???), it would be filled with infinitely more pathetic stories. So I have to excerpt a part from my favorite chapter "The Herbertstrasse," because it was the only time when Wareham doesn't seem to care at all about making himself seem cool:
"I said goodbye to Lee, Justin, and Sean, and followed my new friend upstairs. She took me to her little rented room and told me to take off all my clothes and sit on the bed while she put on some music--the Spice Girls' 'Spice Up Your Life.' She left me alone for a minute. I sat there feeling naked and vulnerable. My friend returned wearing only panties and a bra and said that for another DM 50 she would take her clothes off, too, and wouldn't that be nicer? She was being very gentle with me.
She knelt on the bed next to me and applied the condom. What happened next happened too quickly. I was very excited, and the motion of her hands applying the condom was enough to make me come immediately. Scheisse. Premature.
'Schade,' she said, which translates, 'It's a shame.'
That was that. I got dressed quickly.
The whole experience was disappointing. Sex isn't much fun when you have to pay for it. There was no sweet kiss, no lingering over the moment. I'm not sure if that encounter qualified as sex at all. I felt like I had just paid too much for a falafel sandwich, a disappointing meal at a tourist trap." (186-187)
To me, this is what great writing is all about. Admitting things that you won't admit anywhere else except on the page. Putting it out there for everyone to read and not being scared by what anybody would think about you afterwards. I feel bad quoting what must be the most lurid portion of the book, but it is an example of why Black Postcards is great: Wareham has the right attitude about memoir-writing.
I said before there is not a personal story about addiction, but there is a mini-biography provided in the way of Wareham's friend and A & R representative for Elektra records, Terry Tolkin. The early chapters on his friendship with Tolkin are some of the most moving chapters of the entire book. Tolkin had run away from home in Rockland county when he was sixteen to New York where he sold acid and worked as a prostitute and eventually got into punk rock through an older boyfriend that he lived with in 1978 who lived around the corner from CBGB. Around this same time, Wareham himself was living in New York, going to the private Dalton High School, and being a "part-time punk," seeing Richard Hell and the Voidoids as his first show. But Tolkin eventually worked at the record store 99 Records, which then formed a label, which then signed a bunch of prominent no-wave bands, and finally Tolkin started booking Big Black and the Butthole Surfers. By the time he is working with and befriending Dean in Luna and going on tours with them, he's making a six-figure salary working out of Rockefeller Plaza and doing copious amounts of drugs. I might as well spoil what happened to him as I've spoiled so many other parts of the book, but I would just say, Terry Tolkin is one of the most evocatively drawn characters to come out from this work.
There's probably a lot else to mention about Black Postcards, like all of the musical celebrities Wareham meets, but at the end of the day, the best audience for this book are those that have dreams of being in their own indie rock band. I have pretty much given up on my own dreams in that field because I have zero guitar playing ability and I never worked very hard to practice at it. No, the inarguably more difficult (and crowded) field of literature is my dream, and typing is never something I will find overly difficult. Fortunately for Wareham, he can do both. Fans of Galaxie 500 and Luna and....Dean and Britta....will love this book and anybody with a passing interest in indie rock will find practically every question they could ever have answered.
Anecdote #2:
Shortly before I left Chicago for L.A., I saw that Dean and Britta were playing Schuba's, a bar and rock club in Chicago a short distance from my apartment. I convinced my roommate to go with me even though I had not shoved the Galaxie 500 albums I had down his throat like the other bands I made him go with me to see. This was probably going to be a pretty high cover for the show, and we went to Schuba's, just to see what the scene was like, to see if we were there before they went on. I said if we were there and they had already been on for thirty minutes, we wouldn't go in. Schuba's has a set-up where you can hang out at the bar, and then they have a pair of doors where a bouncer sits and stamps your hand for admission. Well, we were standing near the door, and the bouncer stepped away for a moment, and my roommate mischeviously just pushed the door open, and we were in for free! No one noticed and the set was great. I enjoyed hearing all the new songs by Dean and Britta, and they closed out their set with the great Galaxie 500 song "Tugboat" and I heard a bunch of people in the audience going "Shhhh. Tugboat," like they had to call attention to the song. It's definitely a special memory in my eight-year-history of concert going.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Terrorism
"Terrorism," a story 783 words in length, is another unsatisfactory attempt at an entry for the 1,500 word short story contest. It is similar to "Testimonial" in that it employs a bizarre first-person-second person-first person plural perspective and an unusual context. Eventually it becomes too obvious for its own good. It took me about an hour to write or so. Maybe it was a waste of an hour of my life. I don't know. Please waste five minutes of your life by reading it. It will make me feel better.
Terrorism
Give yourself up already. Come on, we know what you’ve been scheming. The thoughts you’ve been thinking—they’re not pretty, we know. It’s time for you to lose the pretense.
All our lives, we’re just waiting to be noticed. Well, you’ve just been noticed. Please follow us down this path right here. We’re helping you to achieve your destiny.
You don’t want to come along? You don’t like my tone? Oh, but you’re wrong! We’re looking out for you. We’re putting you into a category where you can feel comfortable. Why, if you only knew what was in store for you just down that path. Wonders, I tell you, wonders! Please don’t feel that I’m trying to misguide you in any way. I am part of an organization that only has your utmost safety and security in mind. We care about nothing else. We want to make sure that you can wake up in the morning and go to work, free of disturbance. Except for traffic, ha, ha, ha, that’s not our concern. We want to make sure that while you’re at work you receive the kind of treatment that every human being by all rights deserves to receive. We want to make sure that you’re going to be okay getting home, and that you’ll be safe in your house, and that there will be nothing to worry about creeping around in your backyard.
Oh, so you’ll come along? Fantastic! I’m very happy you saw my side of things. Now that we’ve come in here, I want to ask you, why have you taken such a negative attitude? Why have you been so cynical? Why have you been so sarcastic?
You don’t know what I’m talking about? Maybe you need to reexamine your memory a bit. There was a particular essay you wrote in school. You fit it onto one printed page. You made copies and posted them all around your campus. You put your name on it. Does any of this ring a bell? Well good, I’m glad we’re back on the same page, so to speak, ha, ha, ha. You recall some of the criticisms you made? Yes, I know it was a long time ago, so let me refresh your memory. “Police state.” “Death camp.” “Assembly line of pain.” These are rather strong words you used. The type of people that say these sorts of things are the type we like to check up on every once and a while.
Are you happy? Are all your basic needs being met? We can’t help you with everything, obviously, but we like to make sure you are at least able to properly take care of yourself. We only start to worry when we feel you have reason to start acting out. You’re not frustrated, are you? Thank God! It would be terrible if that were the case. You look like you’re a bit tired. Can I get you anything, a glass of water?
A gun? Now honestly, you must not talk like that! You may only request that sort of thing with a license, and to use for your own protection, or sportsmanship. I am certainly not going to just give you one out of the blue. Besides, crime is at an all-time low, and you’re more liable to cause an accident than to accomplish anything productive with such an instrument.
Now really! Why would you say something like that? You don’t know what you’re talking about anymore. I’m finding you to be quite an uncooperative subject. That is not good. I’m telling you. This is going to be written down. It is going to be on your permanent record. These interviews are extremely important. If you ever so desired a government job, forget about it. You’ll have to hope your next employer has no scruples and doesn’t care a whit for background checks. You’ll have to start behaving appropriately if you want things to work in your favor in the future.
That’s much better. I’m glad you see my side of things. Honestly, you don’t feel so cynical anymore now, do you? You’d rather criticize yourself than the surrounding atmosphere at this point—is that fair to say? You have to start behaving responsibly. You have to think logically about your future. I want you to start choosing your words more carefully from now on.
You won’t? Well, fine, if you won’t cooperate than I am going to write this down. Subject does not like to cooperate. Subject does not work well within a team. There, it’s done, are you happy? What a fool you are. You had your chance, and now you just blew it. I hope you’re proud.
Terrorism
Give yourself up already. Come on, we know what you’ve been scheming. The thoughts you’ve been thinking—they’re not pretty, we know. It’s time for you to lose the pretense.
All our lives, we’re just waiting to be noticed. Well, you’ve just been noticed. Please follow us down this path right here. We’re helping you to achieve your destiny.
You don’t want to come along? You don’t like my tone? Oh, but you’re wrong! We’re looking out for you. We’re putting you into a category where you can feel comfortable. Why, if you only knew what was in store for you just down that path. Wonders, I tell you, wonders! Please don’t feel that I’m trying to misguide you in any way. I am part of an organization that only has your utmost safety and security in mind. We care about nothing else. We want to make sure that you can wake up in the morning and go to work, free of disturbance. Except for traffic, ha, ha, ha, that’s not our concern. We want to make sure that while you’re at work you receive the kind of treatment that every human being by all rights deserves to receive. We want to make sure that you’re going to be okay getting home, and that you’ll be safe in your house, and that there will be nothing to worry about creeping around in your backyard.
Oh, so you’ll come along? Fantastic! I’m very happy you saw my side of things. Now that we’ve come in here, I want to ask you, why have you taken such a negative attitude? Why have you been so cynical? Why have you been so sarcastic?
You don’t know what I’m talking about? Maybe you need to reexamine your memory a bit. There was a particular essay you wrote in school. You fit it onto one printed page. You made copies and posted them all around your campus. You put your name on it. Does any of this ring a bell? Well good, I’m glad we’re back on the same page, so to speak, ha, ha, ha. You recall some of the criticisms you made? Yes, I know it was a long time ago, so let me refresh your memory. “Police state.” “Death camp.” “Assembly line of pain.” These are rather strong words you used. The type of people that say these sorts of things are the type we like to check up on every once and a while.
Are you happy? Are all your basic needs being met? We can’t help you with everything, obviously, but we like to make sure you are at least able to properly take care of yourself. We only start to worry when we feel you have reason to start acting out. You’re not frustrated, are you? Thank God! It would be terrible if that were the case. You look like you’re a bit tired. Can I get you anything, a glass of water?
A gun? Now honestly, you must not talk like that! You may only request that sort of thing with a license, and to use for your own protection, or sportsmanship. I am certainly not going to just give you one out of the blue. Besides, crime is at an all-time low, and you’re more liable to cause an accident than to accomplish anything productive with such an instrument.
Now really! Why would you say something like that? You don’t know what you’re talking about anymore. I’m finding you to be quite an uncooperative subject. That is not good. I’m telling you. This is going to be written down. It is going to be on your permanent record. These interviews are extremely important. If you ever so desired a government job, forget about it. You’ll have to hope your next employer has no scruples and doesn’t care a whit for background checks. You’ll have to start behaving appropriately if you want things to work in your favor in the future.
That’s much better. I’m glad you see my side of things. Honestly, you don’t feel so cynical anymore now, do you? You’d rather criticize yourself than the surrounding atmosphere at this point—is that fair to say? You have to start behaving responsibly. You have to think logically about your future. I want you to start choosing your words more carefully from now on.
You won’t? Well, fine, if you won’t cooperate than I am going to write this down. Subject does not like to cooperate. Subject does not work well within a team. There, it’s done, are you happy? What a fool you are. You had your chance, and now you just blew it. I hope you’re proud.
Choke - Chuck Palahniuk
Here at Flying Houses, we have a new mission: review all of the books by Chuck Palahniuk and provide a detailed critique of his entire oeuvre. Okay well I am not sure I will be so excited to read Fight Club again since it is oh-so-familiar a concept at this point, but regardless, we have knocked out Survivor, Rant, and Choke in...how long? 3 weeks? What! Coming up next on the table are Invisible Monsters, Snuff, Haunted, Lullaby, and Diary. And then maybe Stranger than Fiction. Difficult task, tedious description, but the books are always quite manageable.
I originally got onto this kick by wanting to read Choke since the movie had just been released. Well, now I can see the movie. There are many details of the film that seem to make it into the review. Main character who is a sex addict that works in a living museum of the colonial era who has a mother with Alzheimer's disease whose health care he pays for by choking at every restaurant in his area and being saved by a fellow patron so that they send him birthday cards with checks in them. The book does not stray very far from that description and I would guess the movie does not either. There is plenty of entertainment to be found and at least a few philosophical truths to be uncovered.
There are over forty chapters in the book and it does skip around in many little vignettes. The main characters are Victor Mancini, his mother Ida Mancini, his best friend Denny, and his mother's caretaker Dr. Paige Marshall. Every character goes through changes in the course of this novel. The opening of the novel shows Victor as a boy with a mother who is always breaking out of jail and sending out signals for him to find her so they can go on more adventures. She is an anarchist.
Some people comment that all of Chuck Palahniuk's books are variations on the same theme. That they're all basically the same book. Chapter 25 contains Ida Mancini's r'aison d'etre--one that does not seem all that far removed from Tyler Durden--but one which is a bit less violent:
"The Mommy, she used to tell him she was sorry. People had been working for so many years to make the world a safe, organized place. Nobody realized how boring it would become. With the whole world property-lined and speed-limited and zoned and taxed and regulated, with everyone tested and registered and addressed and recorded. Nobody had left much room for adventure, except maybe the kind you could buy. On a roller coaster. At a movie. Still, it would always be that kind of faux excitement. You know the dinosaurs aren't going to eat the kids. The test audiences have outvoted any chance of even a major faux disaster. And because there's no possibility of real disaster, real risk, we're left with no chance for real salvation. Real elation. Real excitement. Joy. Discovery. Invention.
The laws that keep us safe, these same laws condemn us to boredom.
Without access to true chaos, we'll never have true peace.
Unless everything can get worse, it won't get any better.
This is all stuff the Mommy used to tell him.
She used to say, 'The only frontier you have left is the world of intangibles. Everything else is sewn up too tight.'
Caged inside too many laws.
By intangibles, she meant the Internet, movies, music, stories, art, rumors, computer programs, anything that isn't real. Virtual realities. Make-believe stuff. The culture.
The unreal is more powerful than the real.
Because nothing is as perfect as you can imagine it.
Because it's only intangible ideas, concepts, beliefs, fantasies that last. Stone crumbles. Wood rots. People, well, they die.
But things as fragile as a thought, a dream, a legend, they can go on and on.
If you can change the way people think, she said. The way they see themselves. The way they see the world. If you do that, you can change the way people live their lives. And that's the only lasting thing you can create.
Besides, at some point, the Mommy used to say, your memories, your stories and adventures, will be the only thing you'll have left.
At her last trial, before this last time she went to jail, the Mommy had sat up next to the judge and said, 'My goal is to be an engine of excitement in people's lives.'
She'd stared straight into the stupid little boy's eyes and said, 'My purpose is to give people glorious stories to tell.'
Before the guards took her into the back wearing handcuffs, she'd shouted, 'Convicting me would be redundant. Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp.'
She shouted, 'We are raising a generation of slaves.'
And it was back to prison for Ida Mancini.
'Incorrigible' isn't the right word, but it's the first word that comes to mind." (159-160)
Longest citation ever? How's that for literary interpretation, eh? You'd never get away with writing a paper on Choke but who knows--in one hundred years perhaps Palahniuk will be studied the same way Hemingway is. That stark, cutting prose style! To be serious again, the last line, "______ isn't the right word, but it's the first word that comes to mind" is one of the repeated mantras of the novel, as is "What would Jesus NOT do?" as is "See also: _____. See also: _____." But that above quotation sums up the spirit of this work. Eventually the reader sees how his mother has affected Victor's worldview, how she teaches him to interpret the world differently from what logic shows to be the truth. And truthfully, it does end up being a rather catch-all novel, with several different areas of focus and no real big, serious "theme."
But on the inside cover it does state, for the purposes of the Library of Congress: 1. Alzheimer's Disease--Patients--Fiction, 2. Sex Addiction. But there are basically a few vignettes that are repeated until the novel reaches its tidy, satisfying, closure-providing end.
1) Stories of Victor as a boy and his mother in her prime anarchy mode. The greatest diversion comes in the chapter that describes his mother's means of employment--as a hypnotist that provides spiritual rejuvenation by inducing a wet dream for her clients with famous women in history.
2) Stories of Victor at the Colonial Dunsboro theme park/museum, where he works with his fellow addict friend Denny, and scenes with him and Denny outside the workplace, sometimes at a strip club, and a few other places. These scenes end up being the most effective in the novel. Their friendship is portrayed quite touchingly.
3) Stories of Victor visiting his mother's at St. Anthony's Nursing Home, and his steadily advancing relationship with Dr. Paige Marshall. This also introduces the most ridiculous and absurd plot element--perhaps the most fantastic notion the novel presents--but also concludes rather eloquently.
4) Stories of Victor having sex with other sex addicts. Notably women who are put on a 3 hour leave-of-absence from jail to attend sex addicts meetings while they are actually not working towards their recovery at all. Notably Gwen, a woman who wants Victor to "rape" her. And then, in the longest scene, Tracy who introduces Victor to the "mile-high club" and sex addiction at the same time. The most particularly painful scene involves what happens during one of these sexual bouts and its prolonged effects on Victor's digestive system.
While it may not strive for the absurd heights of Fight Club or Rant, Choke is a fully-satisfying novel. It could be a book-of-the-month club for Oprah if its story wasn't so concerned with naughty subjects. I have read that the movie is not as good as the book, but the book is highly entertaining, and I am definitely looking forward to seeing the movie, now that I know what the story is all about, now that I can compare what was left out versus what deserved to be included. There's very little to criticize in the text itself.
I originally got onto this kick by wanting to read Choke since the movie had just been released. Well, now I can see the movie. There are many details of the film that seem to make it into the review. Main character who is a sex addict that works in a living museum of the colonial era who has a mother with Alzheimer's disease whose health care he pays for by choking at every restaurant in his area and being saved by a fellow patron so that they send him birthday cards with checks in them. The book does not stray very far from that description and I would guess the movie does not either. There is plenty of entertainment to be found and at least a few philosophical truths to be uncovered.
There are over forty chapters in the book and it does skip around in many little vignettes. The main characters are Victor Mancini, his mother Ida Mancini, his best friend Denny, and his mother's caretaker Dr. Paige Marshall. Every character goes through changes in the course of this novel. The opening of the novel shows Victor as a boy with a mother who is always breaking out of jail and sending out signals for him to find her so they can go on more adventures. She is an anarchist.
Some people comment that all of Chuck Palahniuk's books are variations on the same theme. That they're all basically the same book. Chapter 25 contains Ida Mancini's r'aison d'etre--one that does not seem all that far removed from Tyler Durden--but one which is a bit less violent:
"The Mommy, she used to tell him she was sorry. People had been working for so many years to make the world a safe, organized place. Nobody realized how boring it would become. With the whole world property-lined and speed-limited and zoned and taxed and regulated, with everyone tested and registered and addressed and recorded. Nobody had left much room for adventure, except maybe the kind you could buy. On a roller coaster. At a movie. Still, it would always be that kind of faux excitement. You know the dinosaurs aren't going to eat the kids. The test audiences have outvoted any chance of even a major faux disaster. And because there's no possibility of real disaster, real risk, we're left with no chance for real salvation. Real elation. Real excitement. Joy. Discovery. Invention.
The laws that keep us safe, these same laws condemn us to boredom.
Without access to true chaos, we'll never have true peace.
Unless everything can get worse, it won't get any better.
This is all stuff the Mommy used to tell him.
She used to say, 'The only frontier you have left is the world of intangibles. Everything else is sewn up too tight.'
Caged inside too many laws.
By intangibles, she meant the Internet, movies, music, stories, art, rumors, computer programs, anything that isn't real. Virtual realities. Make-believe stuff. The culture.
The unreal is more powerful than the real.
Because nothing is as perfect as you can imagine it.
Because it's only intangible ideas, concepts, beliefs, fantasies that last. Stone crumbles. Wood rots. People, well, they die.
But things as fragile as a thought, a dream, a legend, they can go on and on.
If you can change the way people think, she said. The way they see themselves. The way they see the world. If you do that, you can change the way people live their lives. And that's the only lasting thing you can create.
Besides, at some point, the Mommy used to say, your memories, your stories and adventures, will be the only thing you'll have left.
At her last trial, before this last time she went to jail, the Mommy had sat up next to the judge and said, 'My goal is to be an engine of excitement in people's lives.'
She'd stared straight into the stupid little boy's eyes and said, 'My purpose is to give people glorious stories to tell.'
Before the guards took her into the back wearing handcuffs, she'd shouted, 'Convicting me would be redundant. Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp.'
She shouted, 'We are raising a generation of slaves.'
And it was back to prison for Ida Mancini.
'Incorrigible' isn't the right word, but it's the first word that comes to mind." (159-160)
Longest citation ever? How's that for literary interpretation, eh? You'd never get away with writing a paper on Choke but who knows--in one hundred years perhaps Palahniuk will be studied the same way Hemingway is. That stark, cutting prose style! To be serious again, the last line, "______ isn't the right word, but it's the first word that comes to mind" is one of the repeated mantras of the novel, as is "What would Jesus NOT do?" as is "See also: _____. See also: _____." But that above quotation sums up the spirit of this work. Eventually the reader sees how his mother has affected Victor's worldview, how she teaches him to interpret the world differently from what logic shows to be the truth. And truthfully, it does end up being a rather catch-all novel, with several different areas of focus and no real big, serious "theme."
But on the inside cover it does state, for the purposes of the Library of Congress: 1. Alzheimer's Disease--Patients--Fiction, 2. Sex Addiction. But there are basically a few vignettes that are repeated until the novel reaches its tidy, satisfying, closure-providing end.
1) Stories of Victor as a boy and his mother in her prime anarchy mode. The greatest diversion comes in the chapter that describes his mother's means of employment--as a hypnotist that provides spiritual rejuvenation by inducing a wet dream for her clients with famous women in history.
2) Stories of Victor at the Colonial Dunsboro theme park/museum, where he works with his fellow addict friend Denny, and scenes with him and Denny outside the workplace, sometimes at a strip club, and a few other places. These scenes end up being the most effective in the novel. Their friendship is portrayed quite touchingly.
3) Stories of Victor visiting his mother's at St. Anthony's Nursing Home, and his steadily advancing relationship with Dr. Paige Marshall. This also introduces the most ridiculous and absurd plot element--perhaps the most fantastic notion the novel presents--but also concludes rather eloquently.
4) Stories of Victor having sex with other sex addicts. Notably women who are put on a 3 hour leave-of-absence from jail to attend sex addicts meetings while they are actually not working towards their recovery at all. Notably Gwen, a woman who wants Victor to "rape" her. And then, in the longest scene, Tracy who introduces Victor to the "mile-high club" and sex addiction at the same time. The most particularly painful scene involves what happens during one of these sexual bouts and its prolonged effects on Victor's digestive system.
While it may not strive for the absurd heights of Fight Club or Rant, Choke is a fully-satisfying novel. It could be a book-of-the-month club for Oprah if its story wasn't so concerned with naughty subjects. I have read that the movie is not as good as the book, but the book is highly entertaining, and I am definitely looking forward to seeing the movie, now that I know what the story is all about, now that I can compare what was left out versus what deserved to be included. There's very little to criticize in the text itself.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Le Scaphandre et le Papillon (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly) - Dir. Julian Schnabel
I took The Diving Bell and the Butterfly out from my local library on Sunday, at the same time I finished reading Despair and at the same time I also checked out Choke. It was a DVD, and it was free, and I had heard very much about it at the end of last year, but still had no idea what it was about. I told my mom she was welcome to watch it if interested and she asked me what it was about and I said I didn't really know. I finally got around to watching it last night, and I think it might be most properly enjoyed if you go into it not knowing anything about it. That said, this review will contain "spoilers." Any discussion of this movie's plot is in fact, a spoiler. If you do not want to have the experience of seeing it altered by foreknowledge, please take my word for it and find a copy and two free hours and surrender yourself to it. I cannot imagine anybody would ever be disappointed by this film unless they are totally and avowedly against foreign films.
Let the spoilers begin. The opening minutes of the film are blurry. The sound is difficult to hear, the words are difficult to make out. Eventually the viewer realizes they are in a hospital. There is a first-person perspective, and for a while it appears that the entire film will continue on in this vein. There is clearly a voice speaking meant to be the main character but it becomes apparent after a few minutes that none of the people he sees are able to hear him. We realize it is only an interior monologue. In the first discernible moments of action, two doctors enter to tell this man that he has suffered a cerebrovascular accident, or a stroke that has left him paralyzed from head to toe. They call it, somewhat humorously, "locked-in syndrome." The only muscle over which he has control is his left eye. He can still see out of his right eye, however, and the doctors decide to sew it shut, which is the first of several painful moments in the film.
Eventually we learn that the main character's name is Jean-Dominique Bauby, and that he is the editor of Elle magazine. His wife, or rather, not his wife but the mother of his children, Celine, is the first to visit him. He has left her for a woman named Ines who will end up never visiting him in the hospital, and only calling him once in another one of the more particularly painful scenes in this film. He has two speech therapists, who see hope in his ability to move his tongue slightly.
The main point to the film, however, is the alphabet, which is painstaking for the viewer to watch as it must have been for Bauby to experience. One very patient therapist, Henriette, recites the letters, E, S, A, R, I, N, T, U, L, and so on, which is the order of the most frequently used letters in the French language, until Bauby blinks his left eye to choose the letter to spell the word he wants to communicate. For some viewers that know "some French," such as myself, the translation of the letters Bauby chooses and the ones that appear on the subtitle will sometimes be maddening. When the therapist (or later, the transcriptionist) says "J" and the subtitles say, "I" of course it make sense, but will make anyone who has studied French feel a little bit stupider for reading the subtitles instead of listening. True, if all French people spoke this slowly, I might be able to understand them adequately myself. The appropriate word for these scenes, which then make up the majority of the film, is "painstaking."
Soon, Jean-Dominique, or Jean-Do as he is frequently called, decides to write a memoir, since he had a contract out with a publishing company to write a book before his accident. He writes the entire book by this method of blinking and the title of the book is the same as the movie. The movie is the adaptation of that book, and since it is something of a poetic title, deserves explanation: the "diving bell" is signified by several scenes in the film of himself in a scuba-diving suit, floating helplessly in the depths of the sea, and the "butterfly" is only signified in a shot or two; the diving bell is his body, which cannot move, which cannot speak, and the butterfly is his mind, which is fueled by his memories, and his imagination, which seems to have become more vivid since the rest of his body has suffered paralysis.
There are many excellent scenes in the film--practically every single one is, really--but amongst the ones that stand out more are the two scenes with Max von Sydow, who plays Jean-Do's father, the flashback scene to Lourdes which shows him with a religious ex-girlfriend on a mission to purchase an illuminating Virgin Mary statue, the scene where Celine takes him on a boat and gives him The Count of Monte Cristo, which he had hoped to write a modern update of through a female perspective, and reads to him from a particularly prescient scene, and finally, near the end, the memory of the stroke he suffered, while riding in his car with his son to the theater.
Julian Schnabel is a name that seems familiar because of his background in modern art, and he has only made a few films of note--Before Night Falls, Basquiat, and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. To be honest, I saw Before Night Falls a few years ago and I fell asleep, but it was during a period when I fell asleep during many movies (note: I also fell asleep during No Country for Old Men, which did not affect me anywhere near as much as this film). Of course Basquiat was great, particularly for David Bowie playing Andy Warhol, but this film more than any other should establish Schnabel as one of the few true artists among film directors of the present moment, and one can only hope that his work will now appear more frequently due to the recognition this film has received.
Let the spoilers begin. The opening minutes of the film are blurry. The sound is difficult to hear, the words are difficult to make out. Eventually the viewer realizes they are in a hospital. There is a first-person perspective, and for a while it appears that the entire film will continue on in this vein. There is clearly a voice speaking meant to be the main character but it becomes apparent after a few minutes that none of the people he sees are able to hear him. We realize it is only an interior monologue. In the first discernible moments of action, two doctors enter to tell this man that he has suffered a cerebrovascular accident, or a stroke that has left him paralyzed from head to toe. They call it, somewhat humorously, "locked-in syndrome." The only muscle over which he has control is his left eye. He can still see out of his right eye, however, and the doctors decide to sew it shut, which is the first of several painful moments in the film.
Eventually we learn that the main character's name is Jean-Dominique Bauby, and that he is the editor of Elle magazine. His wife, or rather, not his wife but the mother of his children, Celine, is the first to visit him. He has left her for a woman named Ines who will end up never visiting him in the hospital, and only calling him once in another one of the more particularly painful scenes in this film. He has two speech therapists, who see hope in his ability to move his tongue slightly.
The main point to the film, however, is the alphabet, which is painstaking for the viewer to watch as it must have been for Bauby to experience. One very patient therapist, Henriette, recites the letters, E, S, A, R, I, N, T, U, L, and so on, which is the order of the most frequently used letters in the French language, until Bauby blinks his left eye to choose the letter to spell the word he wants to communicate. For some viewers that know "some French," such as myself, the translation of the letters Bauby chooses and the ones that appear on the subtitle will sometimes be maddening. When the therapist (or later, the transcriptionist) says "J" and the subtitles say, "I" of course it make sense, but will make anyone who has studied French feel a little bit stupider for reading the subtitles instead of listening. True, if all French people spoke this slowly, I might be able to understand them adequately myself. The appropriate word for these scenes, which then make up the majority of the film, is "painstaking."
Soon, Jean-Dominique, or Jean-Do as he is frequently called, decides to write a memoir, since he had a contract out with a publishing company to write a book before his accident. He writes the entire book by this method of blinking and the title of the book is the same as the movie. The movie is the adaptation of that book, and since it is something of a poetic title, deserves explanation: the "diving bell" is signified by several scenes in the film of himself in a scuba-diving suit, floating helplessly in the depths of the sea, and the "butterfly" is only signified in a shot or two; the diving bell is his body, which cannot move, which cannot speak, and the butterfly is his mind, which is fueled by his memories, and his imagination, which seems to have become more vivid since the rest of his body has suffered paralysis.
There are many excellent scenes in the film--practically every single one is, really--but amongst the ones that stand out more are the two scenes with Max von Sydow, who plays Jean-Do's father, the flashback scene to Lourdes which shows him with a religious ex-girlfriend on a mission to purchase an illuminating Virgin Mary statue, the scene where Celine takes him on a boat and gives him The Count of Monte Cristo, which he had hoped to write a modern update of through a female perspective, and reads to him from a particularly prescient scene, and finally, near the end, the memory of the stroke he suffered, while riding in his car with his son to the theater.
Julian Schnabel is a name that seems familiar because of his background in modern art, and he has only made a few films of note--Before Night Falls, Basquiat, and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. To be honest, I saw Before Night Falls a few years ago and I fell asleep, but it was during a period when I fell asleep during many movies (note: I also fell asleep during No Country for Old Men, which did not affect me anywhere near as much as this film). Of course Basquiat was great, particularly for David Bowie playing Andy Warhol, but this film more than any other should establish Schnabel as one of the few true artists among film directors of the present moment, and one can only hope that his work will now appear more frequently due to the recognition this film has received.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Testimonial
"Testimonial," a story 922 words in length, was started as another attempt at the Writer's Digest contest. I do not feel this is as strong as "Visitation," but it is my attempt at not sugarcoating reality. I have had a few more ideas for stories, but they always strike me as contrived. I don't feel this is contrived, but I really don't feel it would win any contests.
Testimonial
The game is a stupid one. Pretend, for a few minutes, that something manifest in your mind is real. A basketball. Imagine a basketball. Somebody is bouncing that basketball. Who is easier to picture: yourself or Michael Jordan? Fine, yourself. You are bouncing a basketball in your mind. But why are you playing basketball? Are you a basketball player? Do you hope to play in the NBA? Or only at the junior varsity level in your high school? There are many talented basketball players, but only the best will get paid to play the game. Nevertheless, let us remove all doubt. You are bouncing a basketball in your mind.
For the sake of atmosphere, let us place you in an empty outdoor basketball court. Let us pretend that you live in Los Angeles and that you are playing at the Silver Lake reservoir and there is no one else there except yourself. You are bouncing the ball, now dribbling as you begin to run, and you perform a lay up successfully. You shoot around for a while. What are you doing? Are you trying to get exercise or are you showing off or is it simply pleasurable to make the ball go in the hoop?
For the sake of drama, let us place a scout for the Los Angeles Lakers in his car, returning to his home in Glendale. He is driving around Silver Lake and he sees you, the lone basketball player, on the court there. He parks his car on the side of the road and walks up to the court. He grabs onto the chain-link fence surrounding the court. He watches silently. You are shooting from beyond the three-point arc now, and you are not missing. You have not missed a single shot. It is the kind of streak that only happens when no one else is watching.
The scout finally draws attention to himself. He starts clapping. He walks over to the court.
“Have you ever considered playing ball professionally?” he asks.
You do not say anything back because the scout is not real. He is just a manifestation in your mind.
The scout says, “I’m a scout for the Los Angeles Lakers, and with the way you shoot, you could make it professionally. You don’t miss a single shot.”
There are no other players on the court with you and so you have no idea how you would work within the context of a team. Neither does the scout, and he does not exist. The scout disappears because you no longer want to harbor false illusions about playing in the NBA. Now you are just on the court again by yourself, shooting more hoops.
In order to truly be recruited by an athletic scout, you must show that you can play with others, and that you are better than all the others. It’s all about context, you realize. An empty playing field does not provide context. It is only through dominance that talent is expressed.
Forget about basketball. You are not a basketball player. You wouldn’t be wasting your time with this silly mental exercise if you were a basketball player. You would be out in a gym, organizing an impromptu game, with other real people, not sitting or laying down, imagining fake ones.
Let’s start over, so the game isn’t quite as stupid this time. Imagine the roof of a house. Are you inside that house, underneath the roof, or on top of it? Are you a roofer yourself? Have you ever come into contact with someone in supply of roofies? That was a digression, sorry. You are not a roofer, and you are content with the present condition of your roof. If you are not content you cannot afford to fix your roof and so shabby it will stay until some miracle occurs. So, it turns out that you have a shabby roof, doesn’t it? You have a roof that you can’t afford to fix because you have more important things to spend your money on. Like gas. Food. Drink. It is possible to get by solely on water but variable drink flavors are quite a necessity of modern living. Water is plain and is predictable. It is the best thing in the world when you are finished with a long exercise, but you must be allowed more than one type of beverage. You are stuck paying a cell phone bill every month. It’s a necessity. You are also stuck with a cable and internet bill. One of them is a necessity and the other is a good deal bundled together, so why not? This does not even take into consideration whatever you must pay to live in the place you live and it is best if that is not explored at the moment.
So you need a miracle to fix your roof. You need money to fall out of the sky. You need to win the lottery, even though you don’t play the lottery because you don’t harbor false illusions about the nature of luck. What is going to happen? What is your job? If you had a higher-paying job, you wouldn’t have to worry about your shabby roof now would you? It would be fixed. You would be able to afford it.
Okay, that’s all. The stupid game is over. Stop imagining things now. No more basketballs or roofs. Go turn on the TV instead. Make sure you use a DVR so you can fast-forward through all those commercials. That’s much better.
Testimonial
The game is a stupid one. Pretend, for a few minutes, that something manifest in your mind is real. A basketball. Imagine a basketball. Somebody is bouncing that basketball. Who is easier to picture: yourself or Michael Jordan? Fine, yourself. You are bouncing a basketball in your mind. But why are you playing basketball? Are you a basketball player? Do you hope to play in the NBA? Or only at the junior varsity level in your high school? There are many talented basketball players, but only the best will get paid to play the game. Nevertheless, let us remove all doubt. You are bouncing a basketball in your mind.
For the sake of atmosphere, let us place you in an empty outdoor basketball court. Let us pretend that you live in Los Angeles and that you are playing at the Silver Lake reservoir and there is no one else there except yourself. You are bouncing the ball, now dribbling as you begin to run, and you perform a lay up successfully. You shoot around for a while. What are you doing? Are you trying to get exercise or are you showing off or is it simply pleasurable to make the ball go in the hoop?
For the sake of drama, let us place a scout for the Los Angeles Lakers in his car, returning to his home in Glendale. He is driving around Silver Lake and he sees you, the lone basketball player, on the court there. He parks his car on the side of the road and walks up to the court. He grabs onto the chain-link fence surrounding the court. He watches silently. You are shooting from beyond the three-point arc now, and you are not missing. You have not missed a single shot. It is the kind of streak that only happens when no one else is watching.
The scout finally draws attention to himself. He starts clapping. He walks over to the court.
“Have you ever considered playing ball professionally?” he asks.
You do not say anything back because the scout is not real. He is just a manifestation in your mind.
The scout says, “I’m a scout for the Los Angeles Lakers, and with the way you shoot, you could make it professionally. You don’t miss a single shot.”
There are no other players on the court with you and so you have no idea how you would work within the context of a team. Neither does the scout, and he does not exist. The scout disappears because you no longer want to harbor false illusions about playing in the NBA. Now you are just on the court again by yourself, shooting more hoops.
In order to truly be recruited by an athletic scout, you must show that you can play with others, and that you are better than all the others. It’s all about context, you realize. An empty playing field does not provide context. It is only through dominance that talent is expressed.
Forget about basketball. You are not a basketball player. You wouldn’t be wasting your time with this silly mental exercise if you were a basketball player. You would be out in a gym, organizing an impromptu game, with other real people, not sitting or laying down, imagining fake ones.
Let’s start over, so the game isn’t quite as stupid this time. Imagine the roof of a house. Are you inside that house, underneath the roof, or on top of it? Are you a roofer yourself? Have you ever come into contact with someone in supply of roofies? That was a digression, sorry. You are not a roofer, and you are content with the present condition of your roof. If you are not content you cannot afford to fix your roof and so shabby it will stay until some miracle occurs. So, it turns out that you have a shabby roof, doesn’t it? You have a roof that you can’t afford to fix because you have more important things to spend your money on. Like gas. Food. Drink. It is possible to get by solely on water but variable drink flavors are quite a necessity of modern living. Water is plain and is predictable. It is the best thing in the world when you are finished with a long exercise, but you must be allowed more than one type of beverage. You are stuck paying a cell phone bill every month. It’s a necessity. You are also stuck with a cable and internet bill. One of them is a necessity and the other is a good deal bundled together, so why not? This does not even take into consideration whatever you must pay to live in the place you live and it is best if that is not explored at the moment.
So you need a miracle to fix your roof. You need money to fall out of the sky. You need to win the lottery, even though you don’t play the lottery because you don’t harbor false illusions about the nature of luck. What is going to happen? What is your job? If you had a higher-paying job, you wouldn’t have to worry about your shabby roof now would you? It would be fixed. You would be able to afford it.
Okay, that’s all. The stupid game is over. Stop imagining things now. No more basketballs or roofs. Go turn on the TV instead. Make sure you use a DVR so you can fast-forward through all those commercials. That’s much better.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Despair - Vladimir Nabokov
Prepare yourself for another redundant review of praise for V. Nabokov. While it does not quite match the tirelessly beautiful prose of Lolita, or the ever-consuming intrigue and originality of Pale Fire, Despair at least eclipses the mostly straightforward Laughter in the Dark in its execution of Nabokov's version of "popular fiction." That is, the New York Times Bestseller fiction of the day (whether it be 1934, 1965, or 2008), which to be sure, will always be far inferior to practically every sentence this master has set down for print. I was not able to work Bend Sinister into that sentence of novel comparing (which would then include all the works of Nabokov I have read, save Speak, Memory which really should be separately categorized) because it is too clumsy a sentence as it is--though I would also put Despair above that work in its "page-turner" quality. Bend Sinister is a book that requires yet another reading by me someday, but not before Pnin, Ada, or Ardor, The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, or Look at the Harlequins! are tackled (at least those, not including Invitation to a Beheading).
But I had wanted to read Despair for roughly six years and finally got around to it over these past few days. And it was quite different from what I was expecting. I was expecting a story of suicide, with respect to the tagline the novel is marketed by: "Despair is the sardonic story of a man who undertakes the perfect crime--his own murder." Perhaps that very accurate description of the novel would lead any reasonable reader to realize it was not going to be about suicide, but I suppose I associated too much feeling with the title of the work. Suicide is only briefly mentioned--as an excuse for the murder to take place, and as a dismissed means to an end--and anytime there is an opportunity to quote Nabokov, I must flower up the content of Flying Houses by giving into the temptation:
"'He can't be saved,' said I, with what is called, I believe, a bitter smile. 'He is determined to die on his birthday: the ninth of March--that is to say, the day after tomorrow; and the President of the State could not prevent it. Suicide is the worst form of self-indulgence. All one can do is to comply with the martyr's whim and brighten up things for him by granting him the knowledge that in dying he performs a good useful deed--of a crude material nature, perhaps, but anyhow, useful.'" (150-151)
And consequently:
"All is dark, all is dreadful, and I do not see any special reason for my lingering in the dark, vainly invented world. Not that I would contemplate killing myself: it would be uneconomical--as we find in almost every country a person paid by the state to help a man lethally. And then the hollow hum of blank eternity." (220)
The narrator, Hermann Karlovich, is a neurotic madman along the similar lines of H.H. or Charles Kinbote. His atheism is pronounced as the particularly memorable opening to chapter six professes, which would be too much to quote verbatim for an accurate depiction of his worldview. He is a German salesman in the chocolate business who only needs to describe his specific function once ("We were urging a foreign firm on the verge of bankruptcy to convert their manufacturing process to that of ours to supply Czechoslovakia, and so that was how I came to be in Prague." (15)) While in Prague, Hermann comes across a "marvel"--a tramp, lying in a forest just outside town, that appears exactly like himself, in his own estimation. He wakes the man up and the man wonders why he has been disturbed from his slumber and Hermann offers him a cigarette and then calls him a fool and holds up a mirror to the man's face and tells him that he is a double of him.
The man's name turns out to be Felix, and there are not many other characters in Despair. There is only Lydia, Hermann's rather dense, simple wife, Ardalion, her cousin who is a painter of questionable talent. There is also Orlovius, the only friend of Hermann's and Lydia's that is mentioned. Hermann plans several encounters with Felix, finally proposing one night that Felix stage a performance playing the part of Hermann for some definite gain of a thousand marks. After some persuasion, Felix agrees, and then Hermann's plan springs to action. What he intends to do is like a variation on James Cain's Double Indemnity--a mystery plot with a comparable degree of trickery, though also quite simple in its own way.
The circumstance under which Hermann writes this "memoir" is one of the masterstrokes of the novel--when it all appears that things have gone as planned, only for the author to continue on after the fake happy ending. The author's enduring repartee with the reader is reminiscent of certain parts of Mann's Doctor Faustus, except in this case, it is far more excessive and comic. One particular boast he continues to make is of his literary mastery ("And speaking of literature, there is not a thing about it that I do not know. It has always been quite a hobby of mine." (55)), which might be just be attractive to me for obviously personal reasons:
"All this is a digression and not an evasion--most emphatically not an evasion; for I fear nothing and will tell all. It should be admitted that I exercise an exquisite control not only over myself but over my style of writing. How many novels I wrote when young--just like that, casually, and without the least intention of publishing them. Here is another utterance: a published manuscript, says Swift, is comparable to a whore." (89-90)
Or for random bits of comedy:
"Enough--let us go on--roars of laughter are not in my line! Enough, it is not all so simple as you seem to think, you swine, you! Oh, yes, I am going to curse at you, none can forbid me to curse. And not to have a looking glass in my room--that is also my right!" (31)
There also appear to be self-references, when Hermann discusses that he will be passing off his manuscript to a Russian author whom he has met in the town that he presently inhabits, who is then described by Hermann employing rather clever details that abound in this story of "doubles." Despair is a mix of the more plot-oriented version of Nabokov and the literary experimentalist Nabokov and at 222 pages it may just be the short, ideal length of a novel. I would remark that it would provide the material for an excellent Hollywood adaptation, but I find it has already been done, in 1979 (by Rainer Werner Fassbinder). In short, another redundant review of a book by Nabokov on Flying Houses--"It's good. Duh."
But I had wanted to read Despair for roughly six years and finally got around to it over these past few days. And it was quite different from what I was expecting. I was expecting a story of suicide, with respect to the tagline the novel is marketed by: "Despair is the sardonic story of a man who undertakes the perfect crime--his own murder." Perhaps that very accurate description of the novel would lead any reasonable reader to realize it was not going to be about suicide, but I suppose I associated too much feeling with the title of the work. Suicide is only briefly mentioned--as an excuse for the murder to take place, and as a dismissed means to an end--and anytime there is an opportunity to quote Nabokov, I must flower up the content of Flying Houses by giving into the temptation:
"'He can't be saved,' said I, with what is called, I believe, a bitter smile. 'He is determined to die on his birthday: the ninth of March--that is to say, the day after tomorrow; and the President of the State could not prevent it. Suicide is the worst form of self-indulgence. All one can do is to comply with the martyr's whim and brighten up things for him by granting him the knowledge that in dying he performs a good useful deed--of a crude material nature, perhaps, but anyhow, useful.'" (150-151)
And consequently:
"All is dark, all is dreadful, and I do not see any special reason for my lingering in the dark, vainly invented world. Not that I would contemplate killing myself: it would be uneconomical--as we find in almost every country a person paid by the state to help a man lethally. And then the hollow hum of blank eternity." (220)
The narrator, Hermann Karlovich, is a neurotic madman along the similar lines of H.H. or Charles Kinbote. His atheism is pronounced as the particularly memorable opening to chapter six professes, which would be too much to quote verbatim for an accurate depiction of his worldview. He is a German salesman in the chocolate business who only needs to describe his specific function once ("We were urging a foreign firm on the verge of bankruptcy to convert their manufacturing process to that of ours to supply Czechoslovakia, and so that was how I came to be in Prague." (15)) While in Prague, Hermann comes across a "marvel"--a tramp, lying in a forest just outside town, that appears exactly like himself, in his own estimation. He wakes the man up and the man wonders why he has been disturbed from his slumber and Hermann offers him a cigarette and then calls him a fool and holds up a mirror to the man's face and tells him that he is a double of him.
The man's name turns out to be Felix, and there are not many other characters in Despair. There is only Lydia, Hermann's rather dense, simple wife, Ardalion, her cousin who is a painter of questionable talent. There is also Orlovius, the only friend of Hermann's and Lydia's that is mentioned. Hermann plans several encounters with Felix, finally proposing one night that Felix stage a performance playing the part of Hermann for some definite gain of a thousand marks. After some persuasion, Felix agrees, and then Hermann's plan springs to action. What he intends to do is like a variation on James Cain's Double Indemnity--a mystery plot with a comparable degree of trickery, though also quite simple in its own way.
The circumstance under which Hermann writes this "memoir" is one of the masterstrokes of the novel--when it all appears that things have gone as planned, only for the author to continue on after the fake happy ending. The author's enduring repartee with the reader is reminiscent of certain parts of Mann's Doctor Faustus, except in this case, it is far more excessive and comic. One particular boast he continues to make is of his literary mastery ("And speaking of literature, there is not a thing about it that I do not know. It has always been quite a hobby of mine." (55)), which might be just be attractive to me for obviously personal reasons:
"All this is a digression and not an evasion--most emphatically not an evasion; for I fear nothing and will tell all. It should be admitted that I exercise an exquisite control not only over myself but over my style of writing. How many novels I wrote when young--just like that, casually, and without the least intention of publishing them. Here is another utterance: a published manuscript, says Swift, is comparable to a whore." (89-90)
Or for random bits of comedy:
"Enough--let us go on--roars of laughter are not in my line! Enough, it is not all so simple as you seem to think, you swine, you! Oh, yes, I am going to curse at you, none can forbid me to curse. And not to have a looking glass in my room--that is also my right!" (31)
There also appear to be self-references, when Hermann discusses that he will be passing off his manuscript to a Russian author whom he has met in the town that he presently inhabits, who is then described by Hermann employing rather clever details that abound in this story of "doubles." Despair is a mix of the more plot-oriented version of Nabokov and the literary experimentalist Nabokov and at 222 pages it may just be the short, ideal length of a novel. I would remark that it would provide the material for an excellent Hollywood adaptation, but I find it has already been done, in 1979 (by Rainer Werner Fassbinder). In short, another redundant review of a book by Nabokov on Flying Houses--"It's good. Duh."
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Rant - Chuck Palahniuk
After Survivor, and now Rant, I find myself on a quest to read all of Chuck Palahniuk's books from the library. Is Rant as good as Survivor or Fight Club? It definitely does not appear that way at first, but by its end it reveals itself to be the most inventive thing I have read by him yet. I would agree with a couple other reviews I have read of the book that refer to it as being more "sci-fi." It doesn't appear that way at first, with all of the countryish backwoods elementary-level grammar spoken by the characters at the beginning, but by its end, the story has completely mutated into something else that is at once far more compelling and equally absurd. But there are a few things you need to know about it before you go and check it out of your local library:
1) It is an oral history. The only other book I've read in this format is Please Kill Me, which was excellently done--but which I personally find to be something of a cop-out as a writer of fiction. That is, your "book" is really just a lot of different people's memories. That said, a wide divergence of remembrance is perhaps more authoritative than a single author's imagination. Also, a single author doesn't do the work of personally going out and interviewing every person connected to a certain subject. They just make it up as they go along. In the opening page, Palahniuk gives his own warning about the format of the book:
"Author's Note: This book is written in the style of an oral history, a form which requires interviewing a wide variety of witnesses and compiling their testimony. Anytime multiple sources are questioned about a shared experience, it's inevitable for them occasionally to contradict each other. For additional biographies written in this style, please see Capote by George Plimpton, Edie by Jean Stein, and Lexicon Devil by Brendan Mullen."
2) Boosted Peaks and Party Crashing are two of the most important aspects to understand. When one of the major contributors, Shot Dunyan, explains Boosted Peaks, Rant picks up a bit more speed and reveals the second of its several layers. Boosted Peaks are the form of entertainment for the future, rendering books and movies obsolete. Humans are implanted with a switch on the back of their neck that allows them to record their experiences, with all five senses included, and to later sell them to retail stores where they can be rented and experienced by other people. Instead of watching a movie, you live a movie, in essence. There are also other ways to manipulate the "neural transcripts," such as taking acid while experiencing one, and then re-wiring it through one's own experience.
Party Crashing is the practice of decorating a car (for either a "Wedding Night" with "just married" decorations dragging behind a car, a "Tree Night" with a Christmas tree tied to the top, a "Mattress Night" with a mattress tied to the top, or "Student Driver Night" with a student driver sign) with flags as the night calls for, recruiting a team to ride in the car, and roaming the freeways looking for other teams of players to bump against other cars, cause accidents, and stage disputes on the side of the road after a crash. One memorable paragraph about the seemingly cathartic effects of Party Crashing follows as thus:
"From the Field Notes of Green Taylor Simms: Beginning with Santa Claus as a cognitive exercise, a child is encouraged to share the same idea of reality as his peers. Even if that reality is patently invented and ludicrous, belief is encouraged with gifts that support and promote the common cultural lies.
The greatest consensus in modern society is our traffic system. The way a flood of strangers can interact, sharing a path, almost all of them traveling without incident. It only takes one dissenting driver to create anarchy." (130)
The main character in this book is Rant Casey, who has a strange experience involving his grandmother's death by a Black Widow spider, who is told by his "real father" where to find ancient coins worth untold millions of dollars, and who is eventually maltreated to the degree that he literally gets off on sticking his arms down burrowing animal holes for the animals to bite his arms, giving him rabies. Rabies become another major concern in this novel, as the great epidemic of the future.
The society depicted in this book is also notable, though it is not understood until other practices like Boosted Peaks and Party Crashing are. There are Daytimers and Nighttimers, with half of society spending the usual 8 AM to 8 PM, outside, at school, at their jobs, and the other half of society out between 8 PM and 8 AM. There is the I-SEE-U apparatus which has effectively taken over as the governing element of society, and it is not hard to consider Rant, published in 2007, a response to the changing shape of American operations post 9/11.
Eventually Rant Casey gets out of his high school with a $10,000 check and a diploma without graduating for reasons I can't entirely remember and then goes off to live in the City, where one night he meets Echo Lawrence, Green Taylor Simms, and Shot Dunyan on the side of the road after they throw out Tina Something. He joins their posse and the next large portion of the book is an extremely thorough examination of all aspects to Party Crashing. But eventually, one of the people they allow to "Mercy Crash" them, Neddy Nelson, eventually says in one of his testimonies that Party Crashing is not quite as dumb and simple as it seems, that people are doing it more than just for the fun of getting bumped around in cars.
There are a few dozen witnesses in Rant and each of them is given their own distinct personality and voice. While the book takes a while to get started, by its end there is no less compelling material than Survivor or Fight Club. Some might believe the ending goes a little too far off the cliff, but all of the testimony surrounding it combines to create a wholly believable reality. It may be a bit far-fetched, the way things end up getting explained, but it's nothing a reader will struggle against believing, or wanting to believe. Basically, if you pick up this book, and get through the first hundred pages, and start feeling like it's going nowhere, just give it a little more patience. It's far more intelligently designed than it seems.
1) It is an oral history. The only other book I've read in this format is Please Kill Me, which was excellently done--but which I personally find to be something of a cop-out as a writer of fiction. That is, your "book" is really just a lot of different people's memories. That said, a wide divergence of remembrance is perhaps more authoritative than a single author's imagination. Also, a single author doesn't do the work of personally going out and interviewing every person connected to a certain subject. They just make it up as they go along. In the opening page, Palahniuk gives his own warning about the format of the book:
"Author's Note: This book is written in the style of an oral history, a form which requires interviewing a wide variety of witnesses and compiling their testimony. Anytime multiple sources are questioned about a shared experience, it's inevitable for them occasionally to contradict each other. For additional biographies written in this style, please see Capote by George Plimpton, Edie by Jean Stein, and Lexicon Devil by Brendan Mullen."
2) Boosted Peaks and Party Crashing are two of the most important aspects to understand. When one of the major contributors, Shot Dunyan, explains Boosted Peaks, Rant picks up a bit more speed and reveals the second of its several layers. Boosted Peaks are the form of entertainment for the future, rendering books and movies obsolete. Humans are implanted with a switch on the back of their neck that allows them to record their experiences, with all five senses included, and to later sell them to retail stores where they can be rented and experienced by other people. Instead of watching a movie, you live a movie, in essence. There are also other ways to manipulate the "neural transcripts," such as taking acid while experiencing one, and then re-wiring it through one's own experience.
Party Crashing is the practice of decorating a car (for either a "Wedding Night" with "just married" decorations dragging behind a car, a "Tree Night" with a Christmas tree tied to the top, a "Mattress Night" with a mattress tied to the top, or "Student Driver Night" with a student driver sign) with flags as the night calls for, recruiting a team to ride in the car, and roaming the freeways looking for other teams of players to bump against other cars, cause accidents, and stage disputes on the side of the road after a crash. One memorable paragraph about the seemingly cathartic effects of Party Crashing follows as thus:
"From the Field Notes of Green Taylor Simms: Beginning with Santa Claus as a cognitive exercise, a child is encouraged to share the same idea of reality as his peers. Even if that reality is patently invented and ludicrous, belief is encouraged with gifts that support and promote the common cultural lies.
The greatest consensus in modern society is our traffic system. The way a flood of strangers can interact, sharing a path, almost all of them traveling without incident. It only takes one dissenting driver to create anarchy." (130)
The main character in this book is Rant Casey, who has a strange experience involving his grandmother's death by a Black Widow spider, who is told by his "real father" where to find ancient coins worth untold millions of dollars, and who is eventually maltreated to the degree that he literally gets off on sticking his arms down burrowing animal holes for the animals to bite his arms, giving him rabies. Rabies become another major concern in this novel, as the great epidemic of the future.
The society depicted in this book is also notable, though it is not understood until other practices like Boosted Peaks and Party Crashing are. There are Daytimers and Nighttimers, with half of society spending the usual 8 AM to 8 PM, outside, at school, at their jobs, and the other half of society out between 8 PM and 8 AM. There is the I-SEE-U apparatus which has effectively taken over as the governing element of society, and it is not hard to consider Rant, published in 2007, a response to the changing shape of American operations post 9/11.
Eventually Rant Casey gets out of his high school with a $10,000 check and a diploma without graduating for reasons I can't entirely remember and then goes off to live in the City, where one night he meets Echo Lawrence, Green Taylor Simms, and Shot Dunyan on the side of the road after they throw out Tina Something. He joins their posse and the next large portion of the book is an extremely thorough examination of all aspects to Party Crashing. But eventually, one of the people they allow to "Mercy Crash" them, Neddy Nelson, eventually says in one of his testimonies that Party Crashing is not quite as dumb and simple as it seems, that people are doing it more than just for the fun of getting bumped around in cars.
There are a few dozen witnesses in Rant and each of them is given their own distinct personality and voice. While the book takes a while to get started, by its end there is no less compelling material than Survivor or Fight Club. Some might believe the ending goes a little too far off the cliff, but all of the testimony surrounding it combines to create a wholly believable reality. It may be a bit far-fetched, the way things end up getting explained, but it's nothing a reader will struggle against believing, or wanting to believe. Basically, if you pick up this book, and get through the first hundred pages, and start feeling like it's going nowhere, just give it a little more patience. It's far more intelligently designed than it seems.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Cubs Lose
Please proceed to Mark DeRosa's blog on the "Cool Blogs and Things" sidebar. He accurately sums up the terrible feeling pervading so many people intimately connected to this team this year.
Having been an Angeleno for the majority of the 2008 Season, and having lived two miles down Sunset Blvd. from Dodger Stadium, and having seen the spiritual 180 that Manny Ramirez brought to that team on July 31, I am not all that surprised, but I do feel foolish for always wishing for a Cubs vs Dodgers playoff series. Last night after the final pitch was thrown to my personal savior, Alfonso Soriano, and the celebrations began, I made a mischievous remark that of all the teams I would like to see win in the National League besides the Cubs, it was the Dodgers, so a very small part of me was happy for them.
That does not change the absolute pain that so many are feeling now. The point in this case is, an excellent season, one of the best seasons they've ever played, period. The best season I've ever seen them play. The year they look better than every single other team. And they get swept, and in three games, after a long, long, extraordinarily well-played season, it's all over.
I would like to say that Alfonso Soriano seriously let me down. He is the only player I have a jersey for at the moment, and I am a bit ashamed of the way he played in the post-season. He did have an extremely encouraging leadoff single in game 2, but that is old news and doesn't matter now. I'm very upset by the way he played, particularly last night, when there were many, many opportunities to make up the small two-run deficit to force a game 4. But it's all over now, and it's not even worth talking about, much less worth blogging about. Consider this an elegy for the Cubs of 2008 the same way a fairly recent post was an elegy for David Foster Wallace mixed in with a sense of true optimism for this baseball team that will surely never fail to live up to its legend. If the Cubs win, it is almost a disappointment in a way that they won't have that special quality that has defined them for ages now. If the Cubs had won the World Series, we might truly feel that the apocalypse was upon us, particularly as things get tense politically and economically in this country. It's just a shame, though. I sent a message to Joe Biden right after he was named Obama's running mate. I told him to go see Rage Against the Machine and Jello Biafra at the festival going on at the DNC in Denver, CO this year, and I told him that the Cubs would win the World Series, then Barack would get elected President, and then Chicago would be named the host city for the 2016 Olympics. I'm always very disappointed when I make predictions and they don't come true. It makes me feel like even more of a failure. At least I am in good company back in Chicago. This is the best place in the world to be proud of being a loser.
Having been an Angeleno for the majority of the 2008 Season, and having lived two miles down Sunset Blvd. from Dodger Stadium, and having seen the spiritual 180 that Manny Ramirez brought to that team on July 31, I am not all that surprised, but I do feel foolish for always wishing for a Cubs vs Dodgers playoff series. Last night after the final pitch was thrown to my personal savior, Alfonso Soriano, and the celebrations began, I made a mischievous remark that of all the teams I would like to see win in the National League besides the Cubs, it was the Dodgers, so a very small part of me was happy for them.
That does not change the absolute pain that so many are feeling now. The point in this case is, an excellent season, one of the best seasons they've ever played, period. The best season I've ever seen them play. The year they look better than every single other team. And they get swept, and in three games, after a long, long, extraordinarily well-played season, it's all over.
I would like to say that Alfonso Soriano seriously let me down. He is the only player I have a jersey for at the moment, and I am a bit ashamed of the way he played in the post-season. He did have an extremely encouraging leadoff single in game 2, but that is old news and doesn't matter now. I'm very upset by the way he played, particularly last night, when there were many, many opportunities to make up the small two-run deficit to force a game 4. But it's all over now, and it's not even worth talking about, much less worth blogging about. Consider this an elegy for the Cubs of 2008 the same way a fairly recent post was an elegy for David Foster Wallace mixed in with a sense of true optimism for this baseball team that will surely never fail to live up to its legend. If the Cubs win, it is almost a disappointment in a way that they won't have that special quality that has defined them for ages now. If the Cubs had won the World Series, we might truly feel that the apocalypse was upon us, particularly as things get tense politically and economically in this country. It's just a shame, though. I sent a message to Joe Biden right after he was named Obama's running mate. I told him to go see Rage Against the Machine and Jello Biafra at the festival going on at the DNC in Denver, CO this year, and I told him that the Cubs would win the World Series, then Barack would get elected President, and then Chicago would be named the host city for the 2016 Olympics. I'm always very disappointed when I make predictions and they don't come true. It makes me feel like even more of a failure. At least I am in good company back in Chicago. This is the best place in the world to be proud of being a loser.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Dead Boys - Richard Lange
I only mention that because two of the blurbs for Dead Boys invoke Carver (but they also include Denis Johnson). Richard Lange's work does have a bit in common with both of them. The stark style, the "grittiness." But beyond marketing techniques, once you get down to the actual stories, it's clear that Lange has his own slightly skewed brand of originality that Carver and Johnson both employed and employ.
There are very few weak spots in the book. The only story that took me a while to get through was the opener, "Fuzzyland," which is probably the longest story in the book. Okay that's not true. "Bank of America" and "Long Lost" are just as if not slightly longer. But "Fuzzyland" is the most content to meander along harmlessly. It's about a salesman whose younger sister has just been raped and how he and his wife drive from L.A. down to her area of San Diego and stay with her for a weekend and go to Tijuana while a fire continues to bear down on the area near her condo. There are some good moments in it, and it is by no means a dull story, but it may be one of the weaker ones in the collection. But I feel really bad saying that.
"Bank of America" is the second story and it is about a painter who robs banks in his spare time while being a totally normal husband and father at the same time. All of the stories in this collection are first person. This is one of the more notable ones.
"The Bogo-Indian Defense" is about a group of older guys who hang out at a donut shop and play chess. Then one of them dies and one of them gives the narrator the task of returning the ashes to an estranged daughter in Downey. All of these stories take place in the Los Angeles region.
"Long Lost" is an especially bizarre piece about two brothers that meet for the first time over Christmas. I particularly liked this story because the main couple lives in Silverlake and invites the brother to stay with them there.
"Telephone Bird" is where the collection starts to pick up, in my opinion. From here to the end, the stories seem to get better and better. The main character here lives in a boarding house and works as a temp at a gas company while all the other workers are on strike. There is a bird that sounds like a telephone ringing that keeps him up at night. There are other residents of the boarding house that act as extras in a zombie movie. Another one of them is a law school dropout who is mentally unstable.
"Culver City" is about a troubled marriage between a man who takes dying pets away to be put to sleep and a coffee shop waitress who supposedly hangs out with Hollywood celebrities and finds a picture of gay sex that she hopes to use to blackmail the actors in question for $100,000. They also have a son. The husband is sure that the picture will only cause more trouble, and it does.
"Love Lifted Me" may be one of the best stories in the collection. It is about an alcoholic guy living in a motel in Van Nuys who hang outs with/protects a 16-year-old meth addict who is engaged to a guy named Eightball, whose father comes into town for their wedding. Also, the main character is haunted by the ghost of his wife, who jumped off the highway overpass where the Hollywood, Harbor and Pasadena freeways intersect. When they drive over to the county courthouse, the car breaks down, and they end up walking into Chinatown. And the main character thinks he meets a postal worker at a bar who likes him. It's a crazy story.
"Loss Prevention," like "Bank of America" is probably the most "blockbuster" story in this bunch. It is about a new security guard trainee at a Chinese-run grocery store and his friend who is a recovered drug addict and loves to listen to Neil Young. They half-confront a lady who is shoplifting and then are later faced with a harrowing situation.
"The Hero Shot" is about a guy who moved to L.A. when he was young to try to make it as an actor, got one speaking role, two lines, received a lot of encouragement, but eventually served out his time in the city with no more breaks. He goes home to live with his widowed mother. He sells his old comic books for $500. His brother lives down the street from his mom and never visits. This is another very-affecting piece.
"Blind-Made Products" is named for the factory where the narrator's blind ex-girlfriend used to work. The story is mainly about helping a friend named Dee Dee move to a new apartment where they then have a pretty cool party and then run out into the desert to set fire to her car. Another very energetic, memorable story.
"Everything Beautiful is Far Away" -- I don't remember what it is about off the top of my head. Let me check. Oh yeah, it's about the guy who is stalking his ex-girlfriend named Lana and works at a newsstand. This is another especially bizarre story that works to incredible dramatic effect. Also he lives in a bachelor unit and paints the brick wall that is his only view into a beach scene.
"Dead Boys," the title story, is also arguably the best story in the collection. It features the most writing about "the workplace" and slim, yet devastating details about the narrator's concern for a co-worker that he goes to a strip joint with. Thus, the last two paragraphs of the book are extremely powerful. It ends with a bang.
I read this book in two days and didn't really want to have to stop to pause in between. None of the short stories exasperated me. It's hard to review a book of short stories. You have to describe so many different little parts. At least in Jesus' Son the stories are all seemingly tied together by the same main character. Here, some of the main characters may be interchangeable, but they all have distinct little foibles that would be way too disorienting to ever make the case that they were the same person. They are lived in lives. Many of them are borderline alcoholics but few of them toy around with very hard drugs. They are fundamentally decent people. The setting that Lange places them in is the only recurring central character. Anybody who has lived in L.A. will enjoy this book for the all-too-familiar tone of desperation that permeates the city underneath, and anybody who has not lived there will probably enjoy this book and then want to move there to see if it is crazy as Lange makes it out to be. No matter what other weird opinions I have on this book, all of the prose is excellent, and Richard Lange definitely deserves to reach a wider audience. Apparently he is working on a novel now and it will soon be published. I'm definitely looking forward to it.