The penultimate NIED column. #24 will be my farewell column, and is yet to be written. While this post replicates some of the material linked to in the first paragraph, I felt that an update on the matter would be instructive in determining of how many legal educations "scams" at certain institutions continue to exist. My slight complaint about the version appearing on BLS Advocate is that they did not seem to get my point about the Claims Adjuster position posted on our school's job board...
On June 1, 2011, I posted a long “special comment” on
so-called “scamblogs.” That may be found
here http://flyinghouses.blogspot.com/2011/06/special-comment-scamblogs.html. As previously understood between me and the
BLS Advocate staff, I will complete Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
with 24 articles. I felt that since I
was nearing graduation, it was time to reconsider scamblogs, and see how the
landscape has changed in the past two years.
First,
we consider http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot.com, which has just said
“goodbye” on February 27, 2013, after 500 posts. One statement bears excerpting:
19 months and 499 posts later, it turns out that the core
message of this blog – that legal academia is operating on the basis of an
unsustainable economic model, which requires most law students to borrow more
money to get law degrees than it makes sense for them to borrow, given their
career prospects, and that for many years law schools worked hard, wittingly or
unwittingly, to hide this increasingly inconvenient truth from both themselves
and their potential matriculants – has evolved from a horrible heresy to
something close to conventional wisdom.
So the scamblogs have gone away because
people got tired of repeating themselves over and over again, until people at
the ABA decided that it was time to take their concerns seriously. I personally dislike this blog because he
brags about getting 50,000 comments (I have about 100 comments and 30,000 page
views, but I would like to think that I have written on a far more diverse
range of topics). I also have little
sympathy for law school professors that write about how they know they are
“duping” their students—if you believe that strongly about it then get out
(maybe it’s all he’s qualified to do, though).
Next up we have the always
popular “ATL.” I will not say much about
this website as I have written at length on it in my previous special comment
linked to above, but I will just say that I was very distressed to see them
report on the resignation of our Director of Career Services, with a “hot tip”
from a BLS student who bemoaned the fact that a position of “Claims Adjuster”
was listed on Symplicity. Note to self:
Claims Adjuster is not a “legal job” but it’s at an insurance company and they
always need lawyers so they wouldn’t be posting there if that wasn’t at least
part of the concern. Plus those jobs pay
pretty well, and the lead singer from the band Pissed Jeans is a Claims
Adjuster for his day job so I think it would actually be kind of cool to do
that.
I hate “ATL.” I have visited it less and less over the
years. It loads slowly. It’s TMZ for nerdy lawyers and law students. They make all their money off advertising
from various “legal companies” and then they don’t exactly bite that hand that
feeds them, but might as well [tell everyone that if they score beneath 170 on
the LSAT don’t go to law school]. I have
very little respect for this website and hope that my blog will never fall prey
to being such a sell-out.
Lawschoolfail.blogspot.com is
our next stop on the tour, and this site at least opens up with a nice post
(dated December 26, 2012) asking whether the scamblogs are wrong. Now this is an interesting question. The scamblogs may have been right, and they
may actually have effected a grassroots-type of change in the legal profession,
now that US News & World Report has changed the way they list employment
figures for graduated law students. But
do we really need scamblogs anymore?
The blogger makes an interesting
point:
What is the point in not getting married or not trying in
life because you did not get a job after law school? What is the point in
feeling sorry for yourself over the internet year after year? There has
to honestly come a time when you get off the internet and start striving
again. I just can't get over the fact that law school has broken so many
people. I can't come up with any other conclusion than these people were
very weak individuals. Some seem to literally revel in their own self
pity, wallowing in the perceived idea that they are pariahs. Many act as
if they have given up on life, instead of trying to do something else, they
just say "I can't do anything with my degree."
This is basically the point I
wanted to make here. Law school is not for
babies. If you’ve never had a job before
starting law school, then you may not know what it is like to search for a job,
and how demoralizing it can get. It’s
probably going to suck. But things are
different in 2013 than they were in 2012 or 2011 or 2010 or 2009 or even
2008. They still pretty much suck, but
they are, ever-so-slowly (we are told to believe) getting better.
ThirdTierReality.blogspot.com is
an especially vicious site with offensive imagery that seems to revel in parades
after parades of horribles. In the past,
this blog has taken pot shots at BLS and our President. Now, many of us may feel strongly about our
President, but nobody really knows how much of a role she plays in our
school. She is higher up than the Dean,
no? She is the at the very top and has
done her best to plug holes in the sinking ship that is a law school of our
caliber in New York City in these economic times. As much as people might love to hate on her,
the fact is many of us have not even spoken to her, and have no idea what she
is doing behind the scenes. We will not
pay any more attention to the woman behind the curtain.
***
Higher
education may indeed be a scam, but it is a scam with which we must live. Persons concerned that they are not getting
their money’s worth should avoid private education. (Though it is worth noting that many public
institutions have rather inflated tuitions for law school—see University of Illinois at $38,250 a year (in-state); I base my
statement on the cost of attending Northern Illinois University, however, which
most people would consider reasonable at $19,811 a year (in-state).) Many people from my generation will find it
necessary to obtain a higher degree because they have found out that liberal
arts degrees are a a-dime-a-dozen and they are simply not competitive in the
labor economy. I would not say “the hard
is what makes it great,” but I would say “the hard is what makes you prepared
to accept the terms of reality.” I’m not
going to make $160,000 in my first year out of law school, and indeed may not
even get a job paying $57,000. But I am
not going to blog about how I wish I had known better. Law school has been a rigorous education and has
opened up a few more job possibilities than were open to me with a B.A. I will
continue to blog about literature, film, music, and interesting legal
matters. I will never suggest that BLS
“tricked” me into attending (though I may file a complaint against them in
small claims court for $6,000), and whenever I give my “unauthorized tour” of
the library to prospective students, I tell them that it is a very good school,
and the tragedy is that because we are all so well-qualified, a fair number of
us will just get left in the dust because there will always be employers that
only care about class rank.
BLS has
cut back the number of students per class, and ultimately this is the wisest
resolution of the “hyper-saturation problem.”
We may never be as good as NYU or Columbia, but my hope is that one day
(hopefully soon) we will be recognized as a school on equal footing with
Fordham. And I do not think that is an
unrealistic hope.
Thank you very much for featuring my blog, "Law School Fail" on your analysis.
ReplyDeleteSincerely,
Mr. Infinity